Menu

Research

Reliance Q2 FY26: Gross Revenue ₹2.83 Lakh Crore, EBITDA +14.6% — Retail & Digital Drive Growth

Reliance Q2 FY26: Gross Revenue ₹2.83 Lakh Crore, EBITDA +14.6% — Retail & Digital Drive Growth

Reliance Q2 FY26: Gross Revenue ₹2.83 Lakh Crore, EBITDA +14.6% — Retail & Digital Drive Growth

Reliance reported a strong quarter with consolidated gross revenue of ₹2,83,548 crore, EBITDA of ₹50,367 crore (+14.6% YoY) and consolidated PAT of ₹22,092 crore (+14.3% YoY) — driven mainly by Jio (digital) and Retail momentum.

*Consolidated headline numbers*
* Gross revenue: ₹2,83,548 crore (up 10.0% YoY).
* EBITDA: ₹50,367 crore (up 14.6% YoY).
* Profit before tax (PBT): ₹29,124 crore (up 16.3% YoY).
* Tax: ₹6,978 crore.
* Profit after tax (PAT): ₹22,092 crore (up 14.3% YoY).
* Finance cost: ₹6,827 crore;
* Depreciation: ₹14,416 crore.
These are the consolidated top-line and profitability numbers for Q2 FY26.

*Digital/ Jio Platforms*
* Gross revenue (JPL consolidated): ₹42,652 crore (15% YoY).
* Operating revenue: ₹36,332 crore (14.6% YoY).
* EBITDA: ₹18,757 crore (up 17–18% YoY) with margin expansion (+140 bps).
* Jio milestones: subscribers ~506.4 million, ARPU rose to ₹211.4.
Jio’s improved ARPU, subscriber additions (net add ~8.3 million) and higher monetization were key profit levers this quarter.

*Retail (Reliance Retail Ventures Limited — RRVL)*
* Gross revenue (Retail): ₹90,018 crore (up 18% YoY).
* Net revenue: ₹79,128 crore; EBITDA from operations: ₹6,624 crore; Total EBITDA: ₹6,816 crore (up ~16.5% YoY).
Retail also reported 369 million registered customers and 19,821 stores (412 new stores opened in the quarter). Festive demand and faster adoption of quick commerce lifted volumes.

*Oil-to-Chemicals (O2C)*
* Revenue: ₹160,558 crore (small YoY uptick ~3.2%).
* EBITDA: ₹15,008 crore (up ~21% YoY); EBITDA margin improved ~130 bps to 9.3% — supported by better fuel cracks, higher domestic fuel placement and commodity delta improvements.

*Exploration & Production (E&P)*
Revenue and EBITDA were steady-to-low single-digit changes; production volumes and price realizations mixed across blocks.

*Balance sheet & cash flow signals*
* Capex during the quarter: ₹40,010 crore (shows heavy investment activity).
* Net debt: moved to ₹118,545 crore (up slightly from ₹117,581 crore).
* Net debt/ LTM EBITDA: ~0.58x — implies the company remains comfortably levered relative to earnings while investing aggressively.

*Risks & catalysts*
* Catalysts: continued Jio ARPU upsides, further traction in quick commerce and festive retail, and improved downstream fuel cracks (helpful for O2C EBITDA). Jio’s scale (500M+ subs) is a structural strength.
* Risks: higher finance costs (Q2 finance cost rose YoY), large recurring capex, and exposure of petrochem margins to global crude/chain dynamics. Also, compare Q2 to Q1 for one-offs — Q1 included proceeds from sale of listed investments that affected sequential comparisons.

*Conclusion*
Reliance posted a broadly solid Q2 FY26: double-digit YoY growth in revenue, EBITDA and PAT, largely led by Jio’s monetisation and Retail’s festive-led growth, while the group continues heavy capex and maintains a moderate net-debt/EBITDA ratio. Investors will watch margin sustainability across O2C and the cash-flow impact of the ongoing investment program.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

HUL Q2 FY26: Revenue Up 2%, PAT Up ~4% Amid GST-Led Disruption

HUL Q2 FY26: Revenue Up 2%, PAT Up ~4% Amid GST-Led Disruption

HUL Q2 FY26: Revenue Up 2%, PAT Up ~4% Amid GST-Led Disruption

HUL Q2 FY26: Revenue Up 2%, PAT Up ~4% Amid GST-Led Disruption

Hindustan Unilever posted a modest quarter: revenue rose about 2% while reported PAT grew ~4% helped by a one-off tax benefit — margins were under pressure and management declared an interim dividend of ₹19 per share.

*What happened this quarter*
* Revenue from operations (consolidated) for Q2 FY26: ₹16,034 crore, up from ₹15,703 crore a year ago (≈ +2% YoY).
* Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for the quarter: ₹3,729 crore; EBITDA margin: 23.2%, down 90 basis points vs Q2 last year.
* Profit after tax before exceptional items: ₹2,482 crore, down 4% YoY.
* Reported Profit After Tax (PAT, after exceptional items): ₹2,694 crore, up ~4% YoY (consolidated).
* Board declared an interim dividend of ₹19 per share (record date: 7 Nov 2025).

*Detailed numbers (consolidated)*
* Revenue from operations: ₹16,034 crore (Q2 FY26) vs ₹15,703 crore (Q2 FY25).
* Total income (quarter): figures shown in the filing also list components of other income and operating segments (see official table).
* EBITDA: ₹3,729 crore. EBITDA margin: 23.2% (decline of 90 bps YoY).
* Profit before exceptional items (PAT before exceptions): ₹2,482 crore (down 4% YoY).
* Exceptional items (net): one-off +₹273 crore (favourable tax resolution between UK & India), restructuring costs ₹51 crore, and acquisition/ disposal costs ₹38 crore. These swing the pre-exception PAT to the reported PAT.
* Reported PAT (after exceptions): ₹2,694 crore (≈ +4% YoY).
* Basic earnings per share (EPS): ₹11.43 for the quarter (basic).
* Total comprehensive income (quarter): ₹2,698 crore (group level table). Paid up equity: 235 crore shares (face value Re. 1).

*Why revenue was muted and margins fell*
* The filing and the company commentary point to GST-led disruption (rate changes) that affected pricing and demand for a part of the portfolio, which pressured volumes and realizations in the quarter. This is visible in the modest top-line growth despite HUL’s scale.
* Margin contraction (90 bps in EBITDA margin) was because of a mix of higher input/ operational costs, continued investment/marketing spend and the temporary dilution in pricing power related to the GST transition.

*Segment/ cash flow/ other pointers*
* The company’s statement includes segment-level sales and operating data (Home Care, Beauty & Well-being, Personal Care, Foods). The consolidated schedules also show standalone numbers for comparability.
* Cash flows: the cash generated from operations and movement in working capital are shown in the cash flow tables (operating cash flow and taxes paid are disclosed in the filing).

*Segment-wise snapshot*
While the company’s full segment-table for Q2 FY26 is only partially disclosed in the public summary, previous commentary from HUL suggests the following trends (for guidance into Q2):
* The Home Care division has historically grown at low-single to mid-single digit sales growth, with volume growth being stronger than value growth (as the business absorbs input inflation and passes on less pricing).
* The Beauty & Well-being/ Personal Care business has seen better momentum in premiumisation, with moderate unit growth but heavier investment behind brands.
* The Foods & Refreshments segment has been weaker, with demand softness in some categories and cost inflation from commodities like tea and coffee.
* Management commentary (in recent prior quarters) emphasises a shift from margin-first to growth-first: higher brand and trade-spend, more focus on digital & e-commerce channels.

*Outlook and what management has signalled*
HUL has stated it expects consumer demand to gradually improve through FY26, buoyed by lower commodity inflation, improving rural macro trends and continued investment in brand/digital. However, management continues to flag near-term margin pressure due to elevated input costs, trade spend and channel investments. They anticipate volume growth to recover gradually while price growth remains modest.

*Management actions & shareholder returns*
Management approved an interim dividend of ₹19 per share (record date 7 Nov 2025; payment 20 Nov 2025). This signals continued focus on returning cash to shareholders despite the quarter’s headwinds.

*Takeaways*
* Topline: steady but muted — revenue +2% YoY.
* Profit: reported PAT +~4%, helped by a one-off tax benefit; underlying PAT before exceptions down ~4%.
* Margins: under pressure — EBITDA margin down 90 bps to 23.2%.
* Shareholder friendly: interim dividend ₹19/sh.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Gujarat Gas Q2 FY26: Revenue Flat at ~₹3,980 Crore, PAT Down ~9%

Gujarat Gas Q2 FY26: Revenue Flat at ~₹3,980 Crore, PAT Down ~9%

Gujarat Gas Q2 FY26: Revenue Flat at ~₹3,980 Crore, PAT Down ~9%

Gujarat Gas Q2 FY26: Revenue Flat at ~₹3,980 Crore, PAT Down ~9%

Gujarat Gas reported a largely stable quarter on top-line with revenue of ~₹3,979 crore, but profitability slipped — EBITDA at ₹520 crore (vs ₹553 crore) and PAT at ₹281 crore (vs ₹307 crore) for Q2 FY26.

*Headline numbers (company reported — Q2 FY26 vs Q2 FY25)*
* Revenue from operations: ~₹3,979 crore (Q2 FY26) vs ~₹3,949 crore (Q2 FY25).
* EBITDA: ₹520 crore (Q2 FY26) vs ₹553 crore (Q2 FY25).
* PAT (Profit after tax): ₹281 crore (Q2 FY26) vs ₹307 crore (Q2 FY25).

*Operational highlights — volumes & network*
* CNG volume: 3.32 mmscmd in Q2 FY26, up 13% YoY (vs 2.93 mmscmd in Q2 FY25).
* PNG (Domestic): 0.83 mmscmd in Q2 FY26 — +10% YoY.
* PNG (Commercial): 0.16 mmscmd — +7% YoY.
* Total distributed gas: ~8.65 mmscmd in Q2 FY26

*Network & customer metrics*
* CNG stations: 834 operational stations (company added 4 stations in the quarter).
* New domestic customers added in Q2: 42,400+.
* Households served: More than 23.44 lakh households.
* Pipeline network: 43,900+ km of steel pipeline (cumulative).

*Business initiatives mentioned by the company*
* FDODO (Franchise/ dealer) push: Gujarat Gas has signed 74 FDODO agreements to accelerate growth; one FDODO station became operational in Jamnagar during the quarter.
* Corporate action: Shareholders approved the Composite Scheme of Amalgamation and Arrangement at the meeting held on 17th October 2025; the company has filed the Chairman’s Report and confirmation petition with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

*What the numbers tell us*
1. Volume growth is healthy, especially CNG: CNG volumes grew 13% YoY to 3.32 mmscmd, showing strong consumer and transport demand — this is the positive operational story.
2. Top line is steady, but margins compressed: Revenue was almost flat (≈₹3,979 crore), yet EBITDA and PAT declined (EBITDA ₹520 crore, PAT ₹281 crore), indicating margin pressure or higher costs relative to last year.
3. Retail expansion continues: Network additions (4 new CNG stations) and 42,400+ new domestic connections in a quarter show steady on-ground growth and customer acquisition.
4. FDODO rollout is a focus: Signing 74 FDODO agreements and commissioning a station signals management’s push to scale via franchise models.

*Risks and near-term things to watch*
* Margin drivers: If fuel/ gas costs, spot LNG prices, or allocations change, EBITDA and PAT can move sharply — the quarter already showed profit decline despite volume growth.
* Execution of FDODO roll-out: Success of the franchise model will affect future station additions and cost structure.
* Regulatory/ allocation changes: Any government allocation changes for domestic/ priority segments could affect supply mix and economics.

*Conclusion*
Gujarat Gas delivered stable revenue (~₹3,979 crore) and good volume growth (CNG +13%), but profitability came under pressure with EBITDA at ₹520 crore and PAT at ₹281 crore. The company is expanding its network and pushing an FDODO strategy, but margin sustainability remains the key monitorable for the next quarters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Tata Motors Q2 FY26: Sales Momentum in CVs (94,681 units, +12%), Revenue Growth Modest, Profitability Under Pressure

Tata Motors Q2 FY26: Sales Momentum in CVs (94,681 units, +12%), Revenue Growth Modest, Profitability Under Pressure

Tata Motors Q2 FY26: Sales Momentum in CVs (94,681 units, +12%), Revenue Growth Modest, Profitability Under Pressure

Tata Motors Q2 FY26: Sales Momentum in CVs (94,681 units, +12%), Revenue Growth Modest, Profitability Under Pressure

Tata Motors’ Commercial Vehicles (CV) business showed healthy volume momentum — 94,681 units, up 12% year-on-year — while revenue growth was modest and overall profitability at group/PV levels remained under pressure due to one-off items and underlying losses in passenger vehicles.

*Key numbers at a glance*
* CV volumes: 94,681 units, +12% YoY.
* CV revenue: ₹18.4K crore, +6.6% YoY (reported as ₹18.4K Cr).
* CV EBITDA margin: 12.2%, +150 bps YoY.
* CV EBIT margin: 9.8%, +200 bps YoY.
* CV PBT (bei): ₹1.7K crore for the quarter.
Note: Group/Passenger Vehicles (PV) reported significant one-time notional gains which distort headline profitability for the quarter.

*What influenced the results this quarter*
* Volume strength in CVs: The CV business delivered nearly 95k units, a healthy 12% jump. This shows underlying demand strength in commercial transport and logistics. Higher volumes helped spread fixed costs and improved margins.
* Modest revenue growth: CV revenue grew by ~6.6% to about ₹18.4K crore. Volume gains were partly offset by product mix and realization changes, so top-line expansion was smaller than volume growth.
* Margin improvement in CVs: EBITDA margin rose to 12.2% (+150 bps) and EBIT margin to 9.8% (+200 bps). Management attributes this to higher volumes, favourable realizations and cost efficiencies. These margin gains are meaningful for a volume-driven business.

*Profitability — a mixed story*
* CV profitability improved: PBT (bei) for the CV segment was ₹1.7K crore, reflecting better operating leverage on higher volumes.
* Group/ PV distortions: At the group and passenger vehicle levels the reported profit picture is distorted by exceptional items and notional gains on disposal in PV. Some company releases show very large one-time notional gains that swing reported net profit figures — but these are not cash operating profits. Investors should separate ‘underlying operating profit’ (what the business actually earned from making and selling vehicles) from one-offs.

*Detailed highlights*
* CV volume: 94,681 units (+12% YoY).
* CV revenue: ₹18.4K Cr (+6.6% YoY).
* CV EBITDA margin: 12.2% (+150 bps YoY).
* CV EBIT margin: 9.8% (+200 bps YoY).
* CV PBT (bei): ₹1.7K Cr.
* Passenger Vehicles (PV) — reported extremely large notional gain on disposal in Q2 that led to a jump in reported net profit at the PV group level; excluding that gain PV posted operating losses for the quarter. (Company press release shows the one-time notional gain magnitude; treat it as non-recurring.)

*Overall Interpretation*
* CV business is the bright spot: Strong volumes and better margins mean the CV division is moving in the right direction — more trucks on the road and slightly better profitability per vehicle.
* Group headline profit is confusing: Reported group or PV profits are affected by non-cash, one-off accounting items. So, while headlines may show big profits or swings, the core operating picture (especially for PV) is weaker if you strip out the one-offs.
* Watch next quarters for sustainability: If CV volumes and realizations hold, margins could stay higher; but PV needs structural fixes and the one-off gains will not repeat, so investors should focus on underlying EBIT/EBITDA trends.

*Conclusion*
Tata Motors’ CV business had a good quarter — 94,681 units (+12%), modest revenue growth to ₹18.4K Cr, and improving margins (EBITDA 12.2%, EBIT 9.8%). But the overall company headline profit is hard to read because passenger vehicles reported large non-recurring accounting gains; excluding those, PV operating performance remains weak. So, CV momentum is real and encouraging, but watch the next few quarters to see if the improvement is sustainable at the group level.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Why gold funds saw a record weekly inflow — and what it signals for Indian investors

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watchIndia’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s primary-market calendar has come alive. Industry bankers and exchanges expect roughly $8 billion of new equity to hit the market in the final quarter of 2025, with a concentrated wave of large offerings scheduled for October and November. The pipeline is anchored by two marquee transactions: Tata Capital (price band ₹310–₹326; ~₹15,500–₹15,512 crore issue, the largest IPO of 2025) and LG Electronics India (price band ₹1,080–₹1,140; ~₹11,607 crore OFS), both opening in early October. The frenetic schedule would make Q4 2025 one of the busiest IPO quarters in recent memory.

The headline deals — size, pricing and implied valuations
Tata Capital set a price band of ₹310–₹326 (announced September 29, 2025), implying an offer that will raise roughly ₹15,500 crore and a post-issue valuation near ₹1.38 lakh crore. The deal combines fresh equity and promoter sales and aims to open to retail subscription in early October.
LG Electronics India fixed a price band of ₹1,080–₹1,140 and an offer-for-sale of ~10.18 crore shares (15% stake), valuing the listed entity at roughly ₹77,000–₹78,000 crore and raising about ₹11,600 crore if priced at the top. The IPO opens October 7, 2025, and is structured as an OFS by the Korean parent.

Financial context and valuation metrics investors should model
Looking beyond headline sizes matters. For LG Electronics India, FY24 financials show revenue ~₹21,352 crore and net profit ~₹1,511 crore (FY2024), which implies a trailing P/E near ~51x at a ~₹77,400 crore market cap — a premium that demands material future earnings growth or margin expansion to justify. Tata Capital, a diversified NBFC with FY25 earnings that rose materially (Livemint reports PAT ~₹3,655 crore for FY25), will face scrutiny on multiples vs. listed NBFC peers and on embedded credit cycle risks. Investors must therefore triangulate price band, trailing earnings and forward guidance rather than rely on headline demand alone.

Why the wave? demand drivers and market plumbing
Several forces are amplifying the window: heavy mutual fund inflows into Indian equities, strong retail participation in 2025 IPOs, and improved dealer / merchant banker confidence after a string of successful listings that delivered double-digit listing gains (2025 listings averaged meaningful first-day pops). Bankers also point to a tactical calendar: corporates prefer listing windows before year-end for index inclusion and to use positive sentiment to maximise pricing. Domestic liquidity, relatively benign global rates in recent months and active primary-market desks at brokerages have combined to create an IPO “sweet spot.”

Risks — concentration, valuations and liquidity strain
A cluster of large offers over a short window creates three principal risks. First, allocation crowding: retail and institutional pockets are finite; multiple large asks can lead to softer subscription for later deals. Second, rich pricing: several marquee names are seeking premium multiples (as seen with LG’s ~51x trailing P/E), raising the possibility of muted listing returns if growth disappoints. Third, liquidity and secondary pressure: large OFS segments (promoter exits) can introduce supply into the market after listing, weighing on near-term performance. Finally, macro shocks — e.g., an abrupt global risk-off, higher rates or domestic political noise — could quickly reverse investor sentiment.

Rewards — why long-term investors may still care
For long-term, selective investors, the wave presents opportunities: listed access to high-quality franchisees (large retail finance platforms, premium consumer brands, technology-enabled firms) at entry points that may still offer multi-year compound returns if execution holds. Some IPOs are strategic for sector allocation — financials (Tata Capital) for balance-sheet play, consumer durables (LG) for secular demand and distribution scaling. Institutional investors can secure meaningful allocations at anchor stages, while retail investors can use phased participation or SIP-style exposure via small lots to manage debut volatility.

What investors and advisers should watch
* Implied multiples vs. peers: compute trailing and forward P/E, P/B and RoA/RoE for each IPO.
* Use of proceeds/ OFS nature: is capital going into growth (fresh equity) or does it primarily monetise existing shareholders? OFS-heavy deals can signal immediate sellability.
* Anchor demand and subscription timing: strong anchor book builds often presage robust institutional support.
* Underlying business metrics: Net interest margin and asset quality for finance issuers; gross margins, channel economics and working-capital cycle for consumer names.
* Post-listing lock-ups and promoter intent: understand when sizeable promoter stakes might re-enter the market.

Conclusion
India’s projected $8 billion year-end IPO pipeline is a signal of market confidence and domestic investor capacity. Yet success will be measured deal by deal: pricing discipline, real earnings delivery and the market’s appetite for concentrated supply will determine whether October–December 2025 becomes a celebrated theme or a cautionary calendar. For disciplined investors, careful valuation work and staged participation will be the prudent path through the busiest IPO stretch in months.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

RBI raises loans-against-shares limit fivefold: will it meaningfully deepen market liquidity?

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

LG Electronics India Ltd. has set a price band of ₹1,080–₹1,140 per share for an offer-for-sale of up to 101.8 million equity shares (≈15% stake) by its Korean parent, opening October 7 and closing October 9, 2025. At the top of the band the deal would raise about ₹11,607 crore and imply an equity valuation in the ₹77,400–₹77,500 crore range (≈$8.7 billion). The parent intends to pare a minority stake while keeping control.

The numbers — size, pricing and implied multiples
Key deal metrics are straightforward and material to investor maths:
* Offer size: ~10.18 crore shares (offer-for-sale), raising ₹11,500–₹11,607 crore depending on final pricing.
* Implied market cap: ~₹77,400 crore at the top of the price band.
* Stake being sold: 15% of the India unit.
Against LG India’s most recent fiscal figures (reported FY24 revenue ~₹21,352 crore and net profit ~₹1,511 crore), the headline valuation translates to a trailing P/E of roughly 51x (₹77,400 / ₹1,511). That multiple is high versus typical domestic appliance peers, reflecting either investor expectations of rapid earnings growth, premium brand positioning, or the gap between listed peer valuations and private-market pricing assumptions. Investors should view that P/E in light of growth projections, margins and the fact this is an OFS (no fresh capital to the company).

Why LG is listing now — strategic aims and timing
LG’s India business has expanded rapidly in recent years across home appliances, air solutions and consumer electronics, tapping booming demand for premium appliances, higher replacement cycles and a widening service footprint. An OFS lets the parent monetise part of its India exposure while keeping operational control. The timing — early October 2025 — also slots LG into a crowded year-end IPO window that includes other marquee deals (such as Tata Capital), which could either fuel demand via calendar momentum or compete for investor attention and allocation.

Investor demand dynamics — who’s likely to subscribe?
The investor base for a high-profile branded consumer name typically spans domestic retail (brand-loyal buyers), HNIs using discretionary allocations, and institutional investors (mutual funds, insurers, FPIs) searching for stable consumer plays. Given the OFS structure, anchor and institutional interest will be watched closely: strong anchor bids would help justify a premium listing, whereas weak institutional demand could result in muted listing gains or pressure on pricing. The allotment mix, lot size and minimum investment will determine retail participation levels.

Sector implications — competition, pricing power and margins
If priced at the top end, LG India’s valuation would place it among the largest appliance firms on Indian bourses by market cap, potentially re-rating sector comps. Key metrics to watch post-listing are gross margins, EBITDA margins, and return on capital employed (ROCE). LG’s premium product mix (increasing share of value-added appliances and smart devices) can sustain higher margins than mass-market peers, but competition from established domestic players and private labels limits pricing power. Investors should track quarterly margin trends and the company’s channel expansion costs (distribution, service, marketing) to gauge earnings conversion.

Risks and valuation sensitivities — what could go wrong
Three principal risks could challenge the IPO thesis: high implied valuation relative to trailing earnings means expectations are richly priced; macroeconomic/ consumer discretionary weakness could slow replacement cycles and compress margins; because this is an OFS, no fresh equity enters the business — so the parent is simply monetising an asset rather than funding growth, which may lead investors to demand a sharper growth narrative or yield premium. Currency swings and supply-chain disruptions (given reliance on imports for some components) are additional operational risks.

Practical takeaway for investors
Prospective investors should compare the IPO’s implied multiples with listed appliance and consumer durables peers, read the DRHP / RHP for segmental margins, working capital cycles and related-party transactions, and model scenarios: even modest margin expansion could justify a premium valuation, but downside scenarios (5–10% topline miss or margin compression) would produce sharp earnings stress given the high P/E. Given the OFS nature, investors should also weigh potential selling pressure from the parent over the medium term.

Conclusion
LG Electronics India’s IPO (Oct 7–9, 2025) is a marquee OFS that will test investor appetite for high-quality branded consumer franchises at premium multiples. The offering provides an avenue for global parent monetisation and for Indian investors to own a leading appliance platform, but the implied ~51x trailing P/E (based on FY24 PAT) demands a strong growth and margin story — and disciplined, long-term holders will need to track execution closely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Can India’s Private Sector Growth Sustain Itself Amid Cooling Momentum?

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

PhonePe Files for $1.5B IPO at a $15B Valuation: A New Era for India’s Fintech Investing?

PhonePe Files for $1.5B IPO at a $15B Valuation: A New Era for India’s Fintech Investing?

On 24 September 2025 PhonePe Limited filed a Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with SEBI via the confidential route, signalling intent to list in India (likely in early 2026). The company is targeting to raise approximately $1.2–1.5 billion (₹10,000–12,000 crore) through a mix of fresh issuance and an offer-for-sale (OFS), with a headline target valuation of roughly $15 billion (≈₹1.33 lakh crore). Lead managers reported in media leaks include Kotak Mahindra Capital, JPMorgan, Citi and Morgan Stanley.

Key operating and financial metrics disclosed (FY ended Mar 31, 2025)
PhonePe’s DRHP and reporting around the filing highlight a clear improvement in underlying economics for the year ended 31 March 2025: revenue from operations rose about 40% year-on-year to ₹7,115 crore, up from prior year levels; losses narrowed to ₹172 crore (₹17.2 billion) in FY2025 from ₹199.6 crore (₹19.96 billion) a year earlier; and the company reported positive adjusted EBIT of ₹117 crore (excluding ESOP costs) and positive free cash flow of ~₹1,202 crore from operations, per media disclosures. PhonePe also claims major scale: >600 million registered users and roughly 40 million merchants on its platform. These improvements form the operational justification for an IPO now.

Investor-relevant metrics
Because PhonePe is a high-growth fintech converting scale into monetisation, traditional equity ratios like P/E are not currently meaningful; instead investors should focus on growth, margin and balance-sheet ratios that will determine long-term valuation:
* Revenue growth (YoY): ~+40% (FY2025 vs FY2024).
* Adjusted EBIT: ₹117 crore (first positive adjusted EBIT, FY2025).
* Reported net loss: ₹172 crore (FY2025).
* Free cash flow from operations: ~₹1,202 crore (FY2025).
* Loss-to-revenue ratio: loss of ₹172 crore on revenue ₹7,115 crore → net loss margin ~2.4% (FY2025).
* OFS dilution indicated: market reports suggest ~10% stake being sold by existing investors in the offering (subject to prospectus confirmation).
* GTV/ payments share: PhonePe claims a dominant UPI footprint (market share estimates vary regionally); GTV metrics and take-rates will be central once DRHP is public.
These figures imply PhonePe has moved from subsidy-led growth toward cash generation; key ratios investors should compute from the prospectus will be adjusted EBIT margin, operating cash conversion (OCF / EBITDA), net debt/EBITDA (if any).

Valuation context and comparable signals
A $15 billion target valuation places PhonePe among the largest private-to-public Indian tech listings. For investors, the implied revenue multiple (EV / revenue) will matter: at $15B valuation and FY2025 revenue ₹7,115 crore (~$802M at ₹88.7/USD), the implied EV / FY2025 revenue is ~18–19x (back-of-envelope), before accounting for growth and margin improvement. By comparison, high-growth fintech peers globally trade broadly between mid-teens to 30x revenues depending on profitability trajectory, so PhonePe’s multiple will be judged on sustainability of its improving margins and FCF. Reuters and ET noted the valuation and valuation context in coverage.

Risks investors must consider
Regulatory changes (UPI rules, market-share caps), execution risk in scaling financial services beyond payments, and concentrated investor exits via OFS are immediate risks. Macro volatility or a chilled IPO window could force price discovery away from the target $15B. The confidential filing does not guarantee a proposed size or timeline; investors should read the public DRHP once available for precise governance, related-party and contingent liability disclosures.

What investors should do now
1. Wait for the public DRHP for full numbers (detailed unit economics, take-rate, segment revenue split, capex plan, and shareholding/lock-ups).
2. Assess cash generation metrics, particularly adjusted EBIT margin, OCF/EBITDA, and free cash flow trends; these are the clearest signals PhonePe is past pure-subsidy phase.
3. Model multiple scenarios (base: gradual margin expansion and 25–35% revenue CAGR; bull: faster margin recovery and >$2B revenue by FY2027; bear: slower monetisation and regulatory headwinds).
4. Position with sizing discipline. If subscribing, treat the IPO as growth exposure—limit position sizes until 3–6 months of post-listing performance and S-1/DRHP confirmations.
5. Consider secondary plays. Banks, payment-processor partners, and listed insurers/NBFCs that tie into PhonePe’s financial stack may benefit indirectly—evaluate those names on P/E, P/B and ROE relative to historical ranges.

Conclusion
PhonePe’s confidential DRHP filing on 24 Sep 2025 for a $1.2–1.5B raise at a $15B valuation is a major milestone for India’s fintech ecosystem. The company’s move toward reported positive adjusted EBIT and free cash flow materially changes the investment narrative, but investors should insist on prospectus-level details (unit economics, dilution, lock-ups, and regulatory risk) before making allocation decisions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Power Grid Outperforms in a Weak Market: Is India’s Utility Sector a True Defensive Play?

 

Infosys to LTIMindtree: IT Stocks Climb on Fed Relief

SEBI Simplifies IPO Rules for Big Issuers, Expands Investor Pool

SEBI Simplifies IPO Rules for Big Issuers, Expands Investor Pool

India’s capital markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has introduced significant reforms aimed at simplifying the initial public offering (IPO) process for large companies while simultaneously widening the pool of anchor investors. These changes are expected to boost participation, strengthen corporate fundraising avenues, and increase retail and institutional interest in the primary market.

Simplifying IPO norms for large issuers
Under the revised guidelines, SEBI has eased the minimum public shareholding requirements and streamlined disclosure norms for companies planning IPOs with an issue size of over ₹10,000 crore. Large issuers often face challenges meeting stringent requirements, which can delay their listing process. By relaxing certain thresholds, SEBI aims to encourage more companies to tap into India’s equity markets, especially those with global ambitions and high capital needs.
Previously, companies launching mega IPOs were required to adhere to strict timelines for increasing public shareholding and faced limits on allocation structures. The new framework allows greater flexibility, making it easier for large corporations to raise funds without being burdened by rigid compliance structures. This is expected to attract technology firms, new-age startups, and capital-intensive industries such as infrastructure and energy to pursue listings.

Expanding the anchor investor pool
Anchor investors, typically large institutional buyers who commit to purchasing shares before an IPO opens for public subscription, provide stability and confidence to the offering. Until now, this pool was largely restricted to a set of qualified institutional buyers (QIBs). With the revised norms, SEBI has broadened eligibility to include a wider range of institutional investors, such as sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, and certain category II alternative investment funds (AIFs). This expansion is expected to deepen liquidity, enhance price discovery, and distribute IPO risk more evenly across a diverse set of investors.

Boosting confidence in primary markets
These reforms are timely, given the resurgence of IPO activity in India. Over the past two years, several companies have delayed or downsized their IPOs due to volatile market conditions and concerns about investor appetite. By offering flexibility in shareholding norms and expanding anchor participation, SEBI is sending a strong signal of support to issuers and investors alike. Analysts believe that the measures will reduce the execution risks associated with mega IPOs, as issuers will now be able to secure a more stable and diverse investor base early in the process. Furthermore, retail investors could benefit indirectly, as enhanced anchor participation often results in stronger aftermarket performance.

Addressing global competitiveness
India has become one of the most attractive destinations for capital raising, but regulatory hurdles sometimes push companies to explore overseas listings. By easing IPO norms domestically, SEBI is working to retain large issuers within Indian markets, ensuring that domestic investors can participate in the growth story of homegrown enterprises. Global peers such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange already provide flexible frameworks for large issuers, which has made them attractive destinations for listings. SEBI’s latest reforms align India more closely with these international practices, reducing the gap and making the country a competitive choice for global capital.

Market reactions and expectations
The reforms have been widely welcomed by market participants. Investment bankers see this as a positive development that will reduce bottlenecks in deal-making and help accelerate India’s IPO pipeline. Institutional investors, particularly sovereign and pension funds, have expressed interest in participating under the expanded anchor category. However, some experts have cautioned that while easing norms can encourage participation, regulators must ensure strong investor protection mechanisms remain intact. Transparency in disclosures, proper due diligence, and strict monitoring of anchor lock-in periods will remain critical to maintaining market integrity.

Potential impact on upcoming IPOs
Several high-profile companies, particularly in the financial services, energy, and technology sectors, are expected to benefit from the revised guidelines. Companies with large fundraising requirements may now find it easier to structure their IPOs in ways that attract both domestic and foreign investors. The move could also encourage firms that had been hesitant about listing due to compliance concerns to revisit their IPO plans. Analysts predict a surge in large IPO filings in the coming quarters, which could further deepen India’s capital markets.

Conclusion
SEBI’s decision to ease IPO norms for large issuers and expand the anchor investor pool represents a progressive step toward fostering a more dynamic, inclusive, and globally competitive capital market in India. By balancing flexibility with investor protection, the reforms are poised to unlock greater opportunities for companies, investors, and the economy at large.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

GK Energy Limited IPO: Assessing Investment Potential in India’s Solar-Powered Agricultural Infrastructure

GK Energy Limited IPO: Assessing Investment Potential in India’s Solar-Powered Agricultural Infrastructure

GK Energy Limited IPO: Assessing Investment Potential in India’s Solar-Powered Agricultural Infrastructure

GK Energy Limited IPO: Assessing Investment Potential in India’s Solar-Powered Agricultural Infrastructure

GK Energy Limited specializes in designing, installing, and maintaining solar-powered water pump systems for agriculture under the PM-KUSUM scheme. As a pure-play EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Commissioning) provider, the company focuses on project execution while outsourcing components from trusted suppliers on a long term contractual basis. This asset-light approach allows GK Energy to scale efficiently while maintaining operational flexibility. The PM-KUSUM scheme, aimed at promoting renewable energy adoption in farming, provides a steady and predictable demand pipeline. GK Energy has leveraged this policy environment to become a market leader, creating a strong brand presence and an extensive network for installations and service. Its expertise ensures timely delivery and ongoing maintenance, which strengthens customer trust and positions the company favorably in a fragmented solar irrigation market.

Business Model and Competitive Edge
GK Energy’s business model emphasizes operational efficiency and scalability:
* Asset-Light Model: Outsourcing key components reduces capital intensity and focuses on execution and service.
* Execution Excellence: Timely completion of government projects enhances credibility and stakeholder relationships.
* Market Leadership: Strong presence in solar agricultural installations under PM-KUSUM provides first-mover advantages.
* Government Alignment: Dependence on government schemes ensures consistent demand while aligning with India’s renewable energy targets.
These differentiators create a competitive moat, allowing GK Energy to navigate a fragmented market and maintain market leadership.

Industry Context
India’s renewable energy sector is witnessing accelerated growth, driven by sustainability policies and renewable adoption targets. Solar-powered agricultural pumps combine energy transition with modernized farming practices, creating a niche with high potential. Government subsidies like PM-KUSUM incentivize farmers to adopt solar solutions, generating predictable demand for installation and maintenance services. While the market is fragmented, GK Energy’s strong execution record and policy alignment provide a clear competitive advantage, making it an attractive option for investors seeking stable growth in clean energy infrastructure.

Investment Rationale
1. Growth Potential: Government-backed demand and the rising adoption of renewable energy in agriculture create long-term opportunities for GK Energy. The focus on sustainable farming ensures continued relevance and revenue visibility.
2. Operational Efficiency: An asset-light EPC model enables scalability without heavy capital requirements, while established execution capabilities minimize project delays and operational risks.
3. Strategic Benefits: First-mover positioning, extensive project experience, and strong stakeholder relationships provide a durable competitive edge.
4. Risk Considerations:
– Reliance on government schemes exposes the company to policy risks.
– Fragmented sector dynamics could affect margins due to increased competition.
– Execution risks remain relevant; timely project completion is critical to reputation and revenue continuity.

SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
* Leading player in solar-powered agricultural pumps.
* Alignment with government initiatives ensures predictable demand.
* Scalable and efficient asset-light business model.
Weaknesses:
* Revenue dependence on government schemes.
* Limited diversification beyond solar agricultural solutions.
Opportunities:
* Expanding renewable energy adoption in agriculture and allied sectors.
* Potential diversification into other clean energy and infrastructure solutions.
* Growing interest in sustainable farming practices supports long-term demand.
Threats:
* New entrants increasing competition in a fragmented market.
* Policy delays or changes could impact growth projections.

Investment Recommendation
Recommendation: Accumulate / Long-Term Buy
GK Energy Limited is positioned as a growth-oriented investment within India’s renewable energy sector. Its government-backed demand, operational excellence, and first-mover advantage make it suitable for investors with a medium to long-term horizon.
Rationale:
* The company’s alignment with government initiatives provides stability in revenue streams.
* Scalable, asset-light operations reduce execution risk while enabling growth.
* Strong market position in a niche segment ensures competitive sustainability.
Caution:
Investors should monitor policy developments and sector competition. While fundamentals are strong, short-term market fluctuations may impact performance. GK Energy is recommended as an accumulation target for investors seeking exposure to renewable energy infrastructure and sustainable agriculture solutions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

STL Networks’ Shares Jump on ₹360 Crore PowerGrid Teleservices Contract

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

Urban Company IPO 2025: Subscription Buzz and Profit Milestone

Urban Company IPO 2025: Subscription Buzz and Profit Milestone

Urban Company opens its ₹1,900 crore IPO for subscription on September 10, riding high on investor enthusiasm and a turnaround to profitability in FY2025. Strong brand recognition, sector growth, and grey market premium fuel demand, though risks remain from high OFS and market competition.

IPO Overview: Subscription Timeline and Structure
Urban Company, India’s leading tech-enabled marketplace for home and beauty services, is set to launch its ₹1,900 crore initial public offering (IPO) from September 10 to September 12, 2025. The company’s shares will list on BSE and NSE on September 17, making it one of the most keenly watched tech IPOs of the year.
The issue comprises ₹472 crore through fresh equity and ₹1,428 crore through an offer for sale. Key existing investors, including Accel, Elevation Capital, and Bessemer India Capital, will partially exit via the OFS. The IPO price band is set at ₹98–103 per share, valuing the company at ₹14,790 crore at the upper end. Investors can bid for a lot size of 145 shares—with minimum retail investment at about ₹14,935.

Business Snapshot: Tech-Driven Home Services Platform
Founded in Gurugram in 2014, Urban Company has built a strong reputation for connecting trained professionals with urban consumers for cleaning, plumbing, appliance repair, beauty, wellness, and more. Its tech-enabled platform operates in over 59 cities in India and select overseas markets including the UAE, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia.
The company has serviced more than 97 million orders in India, with professionals on its platform reportedly earning higher than peers in food delivery and quick commerce sectors. Urban Company also markets products under the ‘Native’ brand and has a substantial presence in the high-potential, fragmented home-services industry.

Financial Turnaround: From Losses to Profits
Urban Company’s financials have sharply improved in FY2025, marking its first profitable year after sustained losses.
• FY2023: firm recorded ₹726 crore in revenue but ended with a ₹312 crore net loss.
• FY2024: Revenue ₹928 crore, Net Loss ₹93 crore
• FY2025: Revenue ₹1,260 crore, Net Profit ₹240 crore
The turnaround was fueled by surging revenues and a deferred tax credit; even without the one-time benefit, the company posted a modest operating profit. This profitability, absent in many recent Indian tech IPOs, is a major factor attracting long-term and institutional investors.

Use of IPO Proceeds: Focus on Growth
Funds raised through the fresh issue will support technology and cloud infrastructure (₹190 crore), marketing efforts (₹90 crore), lease expenses (₹75 crore), along with general corporate purposes (₹117.1 crore). This positions Urban Company for scaling its network, improving user experience, and expanding into new geographies.

Risks to Watch: OFS, Competition, Gig Economy
Despite its promise, analysts flag several risks for prospective investors:
• Nearly 75% of the issue proceeds are OFS, meaning most capital raised won’t go directly into growth.
• Profitability, while a landmark, remains new after years of losses—even “one bad year” could pressure valuations.
• The company’s business is heavily urban-centric, with metro areas accounting for 90%+ of revenues.
• Competition from local service providers and other aggregators is robust, and sector regulations (labour, consumer rights, data protection) remain fluid.

Investor Sentiment: GMP and Listing Buzz
Market enthusiasm is evident in the grey market, where Urban Company shares trade at a premium of ₹28–30 above the upper IPO band, signaling anticipated listing gains of nearly 30%.
• The GMP (Grey Market Premium) has doubled since announcement, reflecting strong demand, but remains speculative and should not be the sole basis for investment.
• Leading brokerages describe the IPO as best suited for aggressive, risk-tolerant investors seeking long-term growth or potential short-term gains.
Conclusion: Balancing Growth and Risk
Urban Company’s IPO stands out in India’s startup landscape for its recognizable brand and newly-achieved profitability—attributes missing from many earlier tech listings. With strong market positioning and sector tailwinds, investors see opportunities both for listing upside and long-term growth. However, with a high OFS, metro concentration, and changing industry dynamics, investors need to weigh their risk tolerance. Short-term gains may appeal to retail participants, but sustained growth and broader market reach will ultimately define value post-listing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Porter Extends Series F: New $110 Million Boost Powers Indian Logistics