Menu

Equities

Bajaj Finserv Q2 FY26: 11% Income Growth, 24% Stake Dividend Boost

Bajaj Finserv Q2 FY26: 11% Income Growth, 24% Stake Dividend Boost

Bajaj Finserv Q2 FY26: 11% Income Growth, 24% Stake Dividend Boost

* Consolidated revenue/ total income: ₹37,402.93 crore — +11.0% YoY.
* Profit after tax (PAT): ₹2,244.10 crore — +7.5% YoY.
* Profit before tax (PBT): ₹6,825.13 crore — +14.4% YoY.
* Interest/ finance income (group level driver): ₹19,599 crore — +18% YoY (driven by loan growth and consumer finance traction).
* AUM (where reported for group lending businesses): advanced strongly — media notes AUM growth of ~24% YoY (Bajaj Finance consolidation effect).

*What moved the top line and P&L*
* The group’s revenue rose ~11% because its lending and insurance subsidiaries continued to grow volumes (more loans, more fees and interest). The sharp growth in interest income (+18%) shows lending businesses were the key engine this quarter.
* PBT grew faster (+14.4%) than PAT (+7.5%), indicating items below PBT (tax, minority interest, and some non-operating items) moderated the PAT growth. The investor note/disclosure also highlights mark-to-market swings in insurance investments that affected PAT comparatives.

*Important segment/ subsidiary moves*
* Bajaj Life Insurance (Bajaj Life): Value of New Business (VNB) jumped to ₹367 crore — a ~50% increase YoY. New Business Margin (NBM) expanded sharply to 17.1% (19.3% excluding GST). However, Bajaj Life’s reported quarterly PAT fell (GST impact of ~₹112 crore was cited) — results here are mixed: strong sales economics but short-term PAT hit from tax/GST timing.
* Bajaj General/ Life MTM: The filings/investor note mention unrealised MTM losses (for the quarter) — around ₹70 crore (Bajaj General) and ₹91 crore (Bajaj Life) — this is a part of the lower-level volatility in PAT this quarter.

*Key ratios & efficiency*
* PBT growth (14.4%) > Revenue growth (11%) — suggests margin expansion at operating profit level (or one-off gains in PBT).
* AUM growth ~24% (for lending businesses) implies strong balance sheet expansion — this supports future interest income but requires watching asset quality and funding costs.

*Positive points*
* Healthy growth in underlying finance business (interest income up and AUM growth) — shows demand and distribution strength.
* Bajaj Life’s VNB/ NBM improvement — good for long-term value creation even if near-term PAT was hit by GST timing.

*Risks*
* MTM swings in insurance investments (₹70–₹91 crore style items) can cause quarter-to-quarter volatility in consolidated PAT — keep an eye on investment mark-to-market and any one-offs.
* Funding & asset quality: higher AUM is positive, but monitor loan-losses/ provisions and cost of funds in coming quarters (pressures there can compress margins). Company commentary and investor presentations will clarify management’s view.

*Conclusion*
Bajaj Finserv delivered a steady quarter — double-digit income growth (~11%) and stronger PBT (+14.4%), while PAT rose ~7.5%. The numbers show healthy franchise growth (AUM +24%, interest income +18%) and improving insurance economics (VNB up 50%), but near-term PAT was affected by MTM and GST items. Overall, operational momentum is visible but watch volatility in insurance investments and near-term tax/ GST impacts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Delhivery Q2 FY26 — Revenue Up 17% Yet Back in the Red

Delhivery Q2 FY26 — Revenue Up 17% Yet Back in the Red

Delhivery Q2 FY26 — Revenue Up 17% Yet Back in the Red

Delhivery Q2 FY26 — Revenue Up 17% Yet Back in the Red

Delhivery reported a mixed Q2 FY26: strong top-line momentum and record parcel volumes, but the quarter moved back into a reported consolidated loss after one-time integration costs from the Ecom Express acquisition. Management says the underlying business is healthy and that most integration costs are one-off and within prior guidance.

*Key numbers (consolidated, Q2 FY26)*
* Revenue from services: ₹2,559 crore (reported) — +11.6% QoQ / +11.6–16% YoY depending on presentation; management’s adjusted “excluding Ecom Express impact” figure is ₹2,546 crore (+16.3% YoY).
* Total income: ₹2,652 crore (reported).
* Reported EBITDA: ₹68 crore (this includes integration costs). Management’s adjusted EBITDA (excluding Ecom integration costs) was ₹150 crore with a 5.9% EBITDA margin.
* Reported Profit after Tax (PAT): loss of ₹50 crore (Q2 FY26). Adjusted PAT (excluding integration costs) was ₹59 crore (2.2% margin).
* Integration costs in Q2 related to Ecom Express: ₹90 crore; total integration costs expected to be within ₹300 crore as previously guided.
* Express parcel shipments: 246 million in Q2 FY26 — +32% YoY and +18% QoQ.
* PTL tonnage: 477k MT in Q2 FY26, +12% YoY; PTL revenue ₹546 crore (+15% YoY). Express parcel revenue was ₹1,611 crore (+24% YoY).

*Why revenue rose but the company is “back in the red”*
* Top-line growth: Volumes and revenue expanded, driven by a strong festive season and the integration of Ecom Express customers. Express parcel volumes were the standout: Delhivery handled its highest monthly volumes in September, and October started strong as well. This volume growth translated into higher service revenue.
* One-offs pushed the result into red: The company booked ₹90 crore of integration costs in Q2 (facility shutdowns, equipment moves, employee exits, etc.). When these are included, reported EBITDA and PAT fell sharply and Delhivery reported a ₹50 crore consolidated loss. Excluding those costs, the business produced positive EBITDA (₹150 crore) and PAT (₹59 crore). Management emphasised these costs are within the pre-announced ₹300 crore envelope.
* Margin dynamics: Service EBITDA margin for the Transportation vertical (Express + PTL) was 13.5% in Q2 on management-adjusted basis, and Express service margins are expected to normalize to 16–18% by end of FY26 as volumes scale and network utilization improves. PTL steady improvement is expected to continue.

*Operations & business mix*
* Express remains the biggest growth engine: higher share-of-wallet with clients after the Ecom deal plus festive demand lifted shipments to 246 million in the quarter. Management highlighted D2C/SME volumes growing ~40% YoY — an important sign of organic demand.
* Some non-express lines (supply chain, truckload, cross-border) had mixed performance: supply chain revenue was down YoY but profitability improved; truckload and cross-border had lower revenue sequentially. These are part of the company’s broader portfolio and are being tuned operationally.

*Management commentary*
Integration of Ecom Express is largely complete from a revenue transition standpoint and the network rationalization is done (retention of 7 facilities for long-term use). Management expects the remaining integration costs to be within the earlier ₹300 crore guidance. They also flagged that peak-period profitability targets are likely to be met across Q2–Q3 as festive volumes sustain.

*Risks & what to watch*
* Integration execution risk: remaining integration costs and any operational surprises could keep reported numbers volatile.
* Yield mix: acquisition changed shipment mix (lower average weight due to Ecom Express mix), which reduced yield QoQ even though volumes rose — this affects revenue per shipment and needs monitoring.
* Seasonality and temporary peak costs: management acknowledged temporary capacity build-ups for the festive season that affected margins. The pace of margin recovery will matter for investor confidence.

*Conclusion*
Delhivery delivered strong volume and revenue growth and showed operational scale during the festive season, but headline profitability was hit by expected integration costs from the Ecom Express deal. The adjusted numbers look healthy and management expects margins to recover as integration completes and volumes stay high — however, investors will rightly focus on how actual reported results evolve once the remaining one-offs are absorbed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

From Mumbai to the World: Equity Right’s Climb to the Global Top 3

From Mumbai to the World: Equity Right’s Climb to the Global Top 3

From Mumbai to the World: Equity Right’s Climb to the Global Top 3

From Mumbai to the World: Equity Right’s Climb to the Global Top 3

In a digital world crowded with investment apps and trading tools, carving out a meaningful space without external funding is rare. Yet Equity Right, founded in Mumbai in 2015, has built a strong reputation for independent equity research and advisory, despite being fully self funded.

According to Tracxn, *Equity Right is ranked 3rd among 16 global competitors in its category*, positioned alongside companies from: *Canada (UltraTrader, TraderSync), Germany (Edgewonk), Brazil (Guru), and United States (Stocks+ App, The Trading Buddy, Wise Tradr)*. This isn’t just a ranking, it’s a validation of a decade-long journey powered by consistency, credibility, and sheer bootstrap grit.

Equity Right’s #3 global ranking comes purely from its product strength, user traction, and consistent research quality, not marketing or funding.

The firm’s research desk has delivered an average CAGR of approximately 28%, driven by recommendations such as PFC, REC, HUDCO and Keynes Technologies and many more. Equity Right currently manages an AUM of ₹~440 crore, supported by a steadily expanding investor base across HNIs, family offices, and institutions.

While not a merchant banker, quite a few IPO ready companies have been guided by the Equity Right team. Equity Right has been participant in multiple stock placements with top domestic institutions and leading fund houses. The firm has participated in transactions totalling over ₹1,500 crore over last 5 years.

The firm offers a comprehensive range of research-driven services, including equity research reports, results updates, IPO research, and coverage of corporate and sectoral trends. It also delivers daily market news, expert views, and analysis across currencies and commodities. Its platform features a dedicated investor forum, real estate research, including property rates, top picks, expert opinions, and news.

Equity Right being “unfunded” simply means it has grown entirely through its own discipline, decisions, and user trust. It reflects the long-term, research-first vision of founder Gaurav Daptardar, who built the platform from a small idea into a respected global competitor.

Under the leadership of Gaurav Daptardar, Equity Right’s expansion into investment banking, wealth management, PMS, and full-spectrum research marks a notable milestone for an independently built firm operating across both buy and sell sides.

To summarise, Equity Right’s rise is a story of patience, expertise, and purpose, a budding research house from Mumbai quietly proving that consistent quality can achieve global success.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

HAL Q2 FY26: Revenue ₹6,628 Crore (+11%), PAT ₹1,662 Crore (+11.6%) — Margin Pressure Visible

HAL Q2 FY26: Revenue ₹6,628 Crore (+11%), PAT ₹1,662 Crore (+11.6%) — Margin Pressure Visible

HAL Q2 FY26: Revenue ₹6,628 Crore (+11%), PAT ₹1,662 Crore (+11.6%) — Margin Pressure Visible

HAL Q2 FY26: Revenue ₹6,628 Crore (+11%), PAT ₹1,662 Crore (+11.6%) — Margin Pressure Visible

HAL delivered steady revenue growth at ₹6,62,846 lakh (₹6,628 crore, +11% YoY) and a profit of ₹1,66,252 lakh (₹1,662 crore, +11.6% YoY) in Q2 FY26. However, EBITDA margin contracted, indicating early signs of cost pressure.

*Detailed Quarterly Overview*
* Revenue from operations: ₹6,62,846 lakh vs ₹5,97,655 lakh in Q2 FY25
→ YoY growth: +10.9%
* Sequential (QoQ) growth: from ₹4,81,914 lakh in Q1 FY26
→ +37.5% QoQ, reflecting higher execution and deliveries.
* Other Income: Other income rose to ₹88,894 lakh (vs ₹54,400 lakh YoY)
→ Driven by higher treasury income, interest, and miscellaneous credits.
* Total Income: ₹7,51,740 lakh (vs ₹6,52,055 lakh YoY).
→ +15.3% YoY growth.

*Expense Breakdown — Where Margins Got Pressured*
* Cost of materials consumed: ₹4,07,204 lakh
* Employee benefit expenses: ₹1,33,187 lakh
* Other expenses: ₹51,525 lakh
* Provisions: ₹51,731 lakh
* Depreciation & amortisation: ₹22,540 lakh
* Finance cost: ₹34 lakh
* Total gross expenses: ₹5,63,331 lakh
* ⁠Capital-related adjustments: ₹33,636 lakh
* Net expenses: ₹5,29,695 lakh

*Why margins tightened*
* Material cost increased sharply in line with execution.
* Employee cost rose due to pension and wage-related adjustments.
* Provisions jumped to ₹51,731 lakh (vs ₹25,074 lakh YoY), cutting operating margin.
Together, these factors caused EBITDA margin contraction despite higher revenues.

*Profitability Analysis*
* Profit Before Tax (PBT): ₹2,22,045 lakh vs ₹1,99,668 lakh YoY
→ 11.2% YoY growth
* Tax Expense: ₹55,793 lakh (Q2 FY26)
* Profit After Tax (PAT): ₹1,66,252 lakh vs ₹1,49,036 lakh YoY
→ +11.6% YoY
* QoQ growth from ₹1,37,715 lakh
→ +20.7% QoQ
* Basic & diluted EPS: ₹24.86 (vs ₹22.28 YoY)

*Balance Sheet Highlights (as of 30 Sept 2025)*
1. Assets
– Total Assets: ₹1,22,97,854 lakh
– Non-current assets: ₹16,71,693 lakh
– Current assets: ₹1,06,26,161 lakh
– Inventories surged to ₹28,41,990 lakh (vs ₹21,67,570 lakh in Mar 2025). This indicates build-up for future execution.
2. Cash & Bank Balances
– Cash & cash equivalents: ₹3,13,774 lakh
– Bank balances: ₹41,32,219 lakh
3. Liabilities & Net Worth
* Equity
– Share capital: ₹33,439 lakh
– Other equity: ₹36,62,813 lakh
– Total equity: ₹36,96,252 lakh
* Liabilities
– Total liabilities: ₹86,01,602 lakh
– Non-current liabilities: ₹37,57,725 lakh
– Current liabilities: ₹48,43,877 lakh
– Other current liabilities: ₹32,10,651 lakh

*Cash Flow (H1 FY26)*
* Operating Cash Flow (OCF): Positive ₹7,38,156 lakh
→ Strong collections + working capital movements
* Investing Cash Flow: Negative ₹7,78,408 lakh
→ Heavy investment in capex, intangibles (₹35,587 lakh) and large bank deposits (₹7,69,836 lakh)
* Financing Cash Flow: Negative ₹1,00,667 lakh
→ Due to dividend payout

*Key Disclosures from Management and Auditors*
* Pension cost impact: Additional employee cost due to pension contribution revision: ₹2,175 lakh
* Salary refixation case: Recovery adjustments for workmen: ₹1,193 lakh recognized.
* Inventory flood loss revision: Earlier inventory loss reversed partly; final loss retained: ₹3,664 lakh.
* FPQ (pricing) still provisional: FY24 & FY25 prices pending final approval; sales recognized based on provisional indices.

*Caveats and catalysts*
* Positives
– Strong revenue and PAT growth
– High operational cash generation
– Big inventory buildup signals strong order execution in coming quarters
– Strong liquidity (huge bank balances)
* Concerns
– Margin contraction due to higher material & provision costs
– Pricing uncertainty due to pending FPQ finalisation
– Employee cost volatility due to pension and wage adjustments
– Large working capital requirement as inventory climbs

*Conclusion*
HAL delivered a solid Q2 FY26 with 11% revenue growth and 11.6% PAT growth, backed by higher execution and better collections. However, operating margins fell as costs and provisions increased sharply. Going forward, margin recovery, FPQ pricing finalisation, and inventory management will be key things to watch.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Reliance Q2 FY26: Gross Revenue ₹2.83 Lakh Crore, EBITDA +14.6% — Retail & Digital Drive Growth

Oil market on edge: Surplus builds, trade talks loom — how energy markets are responding

Oil market on edge: Surplus builds, trade talks loom — how energy markets are responding

Oil market on edge: Surplus builds, trade talks loom — how energy markets are responding

On 21 October 2025 Brent crude traded around US$60–61/bbl while U.S. WTI sat near US$57–58/bbl, after both benchmarks slipped to multi-month lows amid growing supply concerns. Over the past month Brent has fallen roughly 8–9% and is down about 20% year-to-date, signalling a meaningful reassessment of near-term demand vs supply. The futures curve has moved into contango (nearer-dated prices below later-dated contracts), a classic signal that traders expect abundant supply and have incentives to store crude for future sale.

The supply story: production ramps and inventory builds
Three structural forces are driving the current oversupply picture. First, OPEC+ has been unwinding voluntary cuts, with plans to lift output (the group’s decisions point to incremental increases such as ~137,000 bpd in recent monthly adjustments and larger step-ups totalling over a million barrels per day across 2025). Second, non-OPEC production (notably Libya, Venezuela and higher U.S. shale responsiveness) has added material volumes; the IEA reports global supply was up substantially year-on-year, contributing to an average market surplus of about 1.9 million barrels per day from January–September 2025. Third, U.S. crude stockpiles printed increases recently (reports noted builds of roughly 1.5 million barrels in a weekly update), reinforcing near-term oversupply.

Demand risk: trade talks and growth uncertainty
Overlaying the supply glut is uncertainty on demand growth, particularly linked to the renewal of U.S.–China trade tensions and headline diplomatic frictions in October 2025. Slower trade and manufacturing activity in China and reduced global trade volumes would dampen oil demand — a risk the market is already pricing. Analysts now debate whether weaker demand growth or continued high production will dominate into 2026; the IEA and EIA scenario work both point to inventory builds persisting into 2026 unless demand surprises positively.

Macro knock-ons: financial market reactions
Lower oil prices have ripple effects: energy sector earnings revisions, pressure on high-yield energy bonds, and potential disinflationary impulses that feed into interest rate and currency markets. Some strategists noted that cheaper oil could lower inflation expectations and push real yields down; others caution that sustained weakness may compress capital spending in the oil sector, with implications for future supply and credit spreads. At the margin, forecasts from major banks project downside to Brent through 2026 (examples include scenarios in the mid-$50s to low-$50s by late 2026). The U.S. EIA’s short-term outlook also models Brent averaging about US$52/bbl in 2026, versus an average near US$69/bbl in 2025 in earlier forecasts — underlining the forward downward adjustment.

Market technicals and where opportunities may arise
1. Storage & contango plays: With a persistent contango, owners of capital and access to storage (or storage-funded trade desks) can earn carry. This is a technical, time-limited opportunity that depends on storage costs and financing.
2. Select upstream exposure on valuation weakness: Producers with low breakevens and strong balance sheets may be attractive on price weakness if one believes supply will eventually tighten. Key screening metrics include breakeven cash costs per barrel, net debt / EBITDA, and 12-month forward EV/EBITDA.
3. Midstream & services with secular cashflows: Pipelines, storage owners, and fee-based midstream assets often offer better downside protection than spot-exposed E&P firms; look for distributable cash flow yields and coverage ratios (e.g., DCF coverage of distributions).
4. Options and volatility strategies: For tactical investors, put spreads or selling covered calls on selected integrated majors can harvest elevated implied volatility while capping downside. Monitor implied vs realized volatility spreads.

Risks and screening checklist
This is a classic “news-driven” environment where headlines (OPEC+ tweaks, trade diplomacy, weekly inventory prints) create rapid repricing. Investors should insist on: (a) balance-sheet strength (net debt / EBITDA under control), (b) low operating breakevens (cash cost per barrel vs current price), (c) management track record on capital discipline, and (d) exposure mix (percent of revenues hedged or fixed vs spot). Models should stress-test scenarios where Brent averages US$50–55 in 2026 and rebound scenarios that push it to US$70+.

Conclusion
As of 21 October 2025, the oil market is tilted toward oversupply and demand uncertainty — driven by incremental OPEC+ supply, higher non-OPEC production, inventory builds, and the economic risks of renewed U.S.–China trade frictions. That combination has pushed prices lower and created tactical opportunities (storage/contango, select financial strategies, and balance-sheet-strong upstream bargains), but any investment must be calibrated to a multi-scenario outlook where prices could remain depressed into 2026 or snap higher if supply discipline returns or demand surprises. Rigorous screening on costs, leverage and cash-flow resilience remains essential.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Air India’s Mega Aircraft Deal: Financing India’s Largest Fleet Expansion via GIFT City and Global Leasing Hubs

The FII turnaround: What’s behind the ₹3,000-crore inflows into Indian equities?

The FII turnaround: What’s behind the ₹3,000-crore inflows into Indian equities?

The FII turnaround: What’s behind the ₹3,000-crore inflows into Indian equities?

In the first half of October 2025, the Indian equity markets witnessed a sharp reversal in foreign institutional investor (FII / FPI) flows. Over just seven trading sessions, FIIs flowed in more than ₹3,000 crore into Indian equities, reversing a protracted, multi-month selling spree. On 16 October, this inflow served as a key catalyst for a rally: the Sensex jumped more than 500 points and the Nifty crossed 25,450. This sudden pivot begs several questions: what has changed in sentiment, macro or valuation? How does this compare with earlier cycles of FII exits and returns? And finally, what does it imply for volatility, valuations, and the balance of power between foreign and domestic investors?

Background: The Outflow Phase & Historical Context
* Persistent Outflows Earlier in 2025: FIIs had been net sellers for much of 2025. As per reports, by early October, cumulative foreign outflows from Indian equities had touched ₹1.98 lakh crore (i.e. ~ ₹198,103 crore) in the calendar year to date. In September alone, FIIs exited about ₹27,163 crore from equities. Between July 1 and early September, FIIs sold shares worth over ₹1 lakh crore, driven by stretched valuations, profit booking, uncertainties over U.S. tariffs and weak corporate earnings. That said, domestic institutional investors (DIIs) often offset the sell pressure, acting as contrarian buyers.
* Past Cycles of Exit and Return: Historically, FII flows in India have been volatile and procyclical: in favorable global conditions, FIIs pour in capital; but when risk aversion or external shocks appear, they rush out. Academic studies (e.g. in “Trading Behaviour of Foreign Institutional Investors”) suggest that FII equity flows display a mean-reverting nature, and are more volatile than local flows. Periods of sharp FII withdrawal often coincide with global rate hikes, tightening liquidity, or geopolitical stress. On the flip side, rebounds in FII flows have marked past equity market bottoms or renewals of optimism — especially when valuations have corrected, macro data improves, or the global liquidity regime turns favorable again.

What’s Fueling the Current Turnaround?
Several triggers appear to be aligning, making foreign investors more comfortable re-entering India. Below are some of the key factors:
1. Macro stability, easing inflation & policy room: The latest Reserve Bank of India (RBI) minutes show that inflation in India has softened, giving the central bank room for potential rate cuts. The RBI left the repo rate unchanged at 5.50% in its latest meeting but maintained a neutral stance; some members advocated shifting to accommodative. Lower inflation expectations, improved growth forecasts (GDP seen ~6.8% in 2025) and a more benign global rate environment are helping reduce the risk premium for emerging market allocations.
2. Strong IPO momentum and fresh primary market interest: October 2025 is shaping up to be a blockbuster month for new listings in India, with expectations of ~$5 billion in IPOs. Notably, the Tata Capital IPO raised ₹15,512 crore, the largest in 2025 so far. Some of the FII inflows may be directly tied to participation in these IPOs or anticipation of liquidity recycling from primary markets into secondary markets. When IPOs succeed and funds return, some capital naturally flows into blue-chips or adjacent equities.
3. Valuations cheaper after earlier correction: The extended FII selling had taken some pressure off valuations. Some key large-caps had corrected and were increasingly seen as attractive entry points for global funds looking for emerging market exposure. When valuations become reasonable relative to global peers, FIIs tend to rotate back.
4. Improved global risk appetite & policy tailwinds: Signs of stabilization in global markets, easing of inflation in the U.S., and expectations of central bank pivots abroad have allowed riskier assets to regain favor. Moreover, international institutions like ADB have urged India to unlock investment through reforms and liberalization measures. Also, as geopolitical and macro uncertainty softens, capital that had been parked on the sidelines is finding its way back.

Risks & Questions: Can the Inflow Trend Sustain?
While the inflows are encouraging, several caveats and risks warrant attention.
* Fragile global backdrop & external shocks: Any resurgence of U.S. rate hikes, renewed inflation, or trade wars could spook foreign investors again. Because FIIs are sensitive to global liquidity cycles, they can quickly reverse course.
* Earnings disappointment & valuation stress: If corporate earnings in India underperform expectations, or input costs and margins are squeezed, the optimism might reverse. The rebound in flows needs to be backed by tangible earnings momentum.
* Currency volatility: The Indian rupee has already seen pressure, dipping to a record low of ₹88.81 per USD on 14 October. Currency depreciation can erode returns for foreign investors, especially if hedging costs rise.
* Role of DIIs & domestic flows: Even though FIIs are making a return, DIIs remain the stabilizing force. In 2025, DIIs have posted significantly larger cumulative inflows relative to FIIs, helping mitigate volatility from external flows. The balance between FII and DII will shape how durable this uptrend is.
* Technical correction potential & volatility: Sharp inflows may trigger short-term reversals or profit booking. The sharpness of the reversal could exacerbate volatility, especially if institutional positioning is heavily skewed.

Implications for Markets & Investors
* Valuation multiple expansion: Renewed foreign capital inflow can support multiple expansion, particularly for mid- and large-cap names. Sectors that had been shunned (like financials, utilities, infrastructure) may see rotation.
* Volatility moderation: Periodic selling pressure from FIIs had contributed to higher volatility in 2025. If inflows are sustained, volatility could recede, providing a more stable environment for institutional and retail investors.
* Rebalancing the influence pendulum: For a long time, FII flows had an outsized impact on market direction. This reversal could re-establish foreign investors as active drivers of returns, reducing the purely domestic bias.
* Strategically selecting sectors & names: Investors may want to tilt toward sectors that are historically favorites of FIIs (financials, large-cap private banks, capital goods) while monitoring undervalued re-rating plays.

Conclusion
The ₹3,000 crore FII inflow over a brief span in October 2025 marks a sharp and welcome shift in investor sentiment. After months of heavy exits, the return indicates that global risk appetite, valuation recalibration, and India’s macro stability are aligning in favor. Yet, sustainability depends on earnings support, global conditions, and currency stability. For now, equities may enjoy a tailwind, but investors must remain alert to rapid reversals in the FII cycle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

BRICS-backed bank plans first Indian rupee-denominated bond by end-March

Aditya Birla Capital Q2 FY26: Lending Momentum Accelerates, but Profit Expansion Stays Mild

Asia’s rise as a capital magnet: why investors are diversifying beyond the U.S.

Asia’s rise as a capital magnet: why investors are diversifying beyond the U.S.

At the Milken Institute Asia Summit in Singapore on October 1, 2025, Kevin Sneader, president of Goldman Sachs for Asia-Pacific (ex-Japan), said investors have channelled roughly $100 billion into Asia excluding China over the prior nine months as part of a diversification trend away from concentrated U.S. exposure. That shift does not imply an abrupt exit from U.S. markets but signals reweighting across global portfolios toward Asian equities, fixed income and private assets.

Why now? valuation, performance and policy differentials
There are three measurable, near-term drivers:
* Valuation gaps: The MSCI AC Asia ex-Japan index traded at a trailing price/earnings (P/E) of about 16.5 and forward P/E ~14.2 as of late September 2025, compared with the S&P 500’s forward P/E in the mid-20s (around 23–27 depending on source and date). That P/E discount makes Asia an attractive source of potential relative total-return upside for global allocators.
* Income and yield dispersion: Many Asian markets offer higher dividend yields and steeper credit spreads on corporate and sovereign debt than comparable U.S. instruments, increasing carry for yield-seeking investors in a world where central bank policy divergence remains important.
* Strategic re-positioning around resilience: Large investors and sovereign funds increasingly prioritise supply-chain resilience, near-shoring and regional diversification after recent geopolitical shocks. Institutional allocators — from private wealth to sovereigns — are rotating allocations to capture secular growth in Asian technology, healthcare and consumer sectors.

Where the money went — pockets of demand
Flows are not uniformly spread. Japan, Korea, Taiwan and selected Southeast Asian markets have been net beneficiaries, while China’s equity gains in 2025 were driven more by domestic participation than by outsized foreign inflows. Meanwhile, India has seen mixed signals: despite a robust IPO pipeline, foreign portfolio investors withdrew about $2.7 billion in September 2025 and roughly $17.6 billion year-to-date through September, reflecting tactical repositioning among global funds. This divergence highlights that “Asia” is heterogeneous — investors are favouring markets with clearer earnings momentum or more attractive relative valuations.

The investor case — returns, diversification and sector exposure
From a portfolio perspective, several quantitative arguments drive allocation changes:
* Expected excess return: If Asia ex-Japan’s forward P/E trades at ~14 and the U.S. at ~24, and if earnings re-rate modestly or grow faster, the relative return cushion is material.
* Diversification: Lower correlation between U.S. mega-cap AI winners and broader Asian cyclicals/consumer names reduces portfolio concentration risk, especially for multi-asset funds.
* Sector exposure: Asian allocations increase exposure to manufacturing, semiconductors, private healthcare and consumer discretionary segments that may offer higher secular growth rates than some mature U.S. sectors.
However, investors must weigh these against higher political, regulatory and liquidity risk in select markets. The OECD and IMF continue to warn that capital-flow volatility can spike with global risk aversion.

Risks and caveats
The inflow headline masks sizeable regional variation and risks. China remains a special case — much of its 2025 equity bounce was home-grown, and foreign mutual funds remain cautious. India is experiencing FPI withdrawals even as large IPOs (projected to raise several billion dollars into year-end) continue to attract domestic and retail demand. A sudden U.S. policy shock, a spike in global yields, or regional geopolitical events could reverse flows quickly. Multinational managers must therefore stress-test portfolios for currency swings, liquidity squeezes and regulatory shifts.

What this means for investors
Institutional and retail investors contemplating higher Asian weights should: tilt toward liquid, large-cap exposures or diversified ETFs to manage liquidity risk; use active managers for markets with higher regulatory complexity; hedge macro tail risks (currency and rate exposures); and
reassess country allocations quantitatively — not by headline flows alone. Importantly, diversified Asia allocations should be motivated by long-term structural factors (population, tech adoption, manufacturing re-shoring) rather than short-term momentum alone.

Conclusion
The roughly $100 billion of inflows into Asia (ex-China) over nine months to October 1, 2025, marks a meaningful re-balancing by global investors seeking valuation advantage, yield, and strategic resilience. Yet the rotation is nuanced: country-level fundamentals, governance, liquidity and geopolitical risk will determine winners and losers. For disciplined investors, Asia’s re-emergence is a call to rethink global allocations with careful sizing, robust risk controls, and an eye on long-term secular growth trends.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Rupee Surge and the RBI Hold: What It Means for Indian Investors

Netflix vs Paramount in the Fight for Warner Bros- What Investors Need to Know

Activist Investors on Overdrive: The 2025 Surge in Corporate Campaigns

Activist Investors on Overdrive: The 2025 Surge in Corporate Campaigns

In the third quarter of 2025, activist investors launched 61 new campaigns globally — the busiest quarter on record — up from 36 campaigns in Q3 2024. Year-to-date through Q3, activists had mounted roughly 191 campaigns across 178 companies, and secured 98 board seats while precipitating about 25 CEO departures so far in 2025. The intensity of activity places 2025 on pace to challenge prior high-water marks in the post-2008 era. These figures come from Barclays’ tracking of global activism and Reuters reporting on the October 1, 2025 data release.

Why activism accelerated in Q3 2025
Three structural and cyclical drivers explain the spike. First, market turbulence — amplified by geopolitical shocks and policy uncertainty in major economies — created valuation dislocations that activists exploit. Second, the persistence of concentrated passive ownership (index funds holding large passive stakes) means a relatively small active holder can exert outsized influence by mobilising the vote or pressuring management. Third, activists have broadened playbooks beyond outright buy-outs to include “vote-no” campaigns, settlement-first approaches and targeted director withholds, which can generate rapid concessions without protracted proxy fights. Legal and advisory firms (and activist vulnerability reports) note that these lighter-touch tactics have lowered the cost and friction of starting a campaign, encouraging more launches even in summer months historically regarded as quiet.

What activists are demanding — and winning
The objectives are increasingly diverse. A Barclays breakdown shows demands span operational resets (cost cuts, portfolio simplification), capital-allocation changes (buybacks, special dividends), M&A demands (sales, breakups or mergers), and boardroom reshuffles. High-profile examples in 2025 included Elliott Investment Management pressing strategic change at legacy industrial and consumer names, and campaigns pressuring companies such as PepsiCo and CSX. Activists have not only pushed for transactions — they have won governance outcomes: tens of board seats have been filled via settlements and proxy fights, and several CEOs have resigned under activist pressure. These wins reinforce the tactic’s credibility and encourage further campaigns.

Market and financial consequences
Activism influences short- and medium-term financial metrics. Targeted firms frequently re-rate: stock outperformance commonly follows settlement announcements or announced strategic reviews, while cost-cutting or divestiture commitments can raise forecasted free cash flow and improve return on capital metrics. Analysts tracking outcomes in 2025 show activists secured board representation on roughly 50–60% of settled campaigns and achieved near-term share-price uplifts in many cases. On the cost side, prolonged fights raise legal and advisory fees and can distract management from operations, potentially depressing near-term revenues or margins. Institutional investors assessing risk-reward therefore focus on valuation gaps (e.g., low EV/EBITDA vs peers), governance quality and balance-sheet flexibility when anticipating activist targets.

Governance implications and corporate responses
Boards are no longer passive. Many have become proactive, running strategic reviews earlier and refreshing governance structures to reduce vulnerability. Companies are adopting pre-emptive measures: improving shareholder engagement, tightening succession planning, laying out clearer capital-allocation frameworks, and using poison pills or staggered boards only as last resorts because aggressive defensive measures can inflame proxy advisers and index votes. Proxy season reviews in mid-2025 also documented an uptick in “vote-no” campaigns — a tactic that forces swift reputational pain without a full campaign — prompting boards to monitor share-owner sentiment more continuously rather than episodically.

Which sectors are most exposed?
Historically, sectors with complex capital structures, heavy asset bases, underperforming cash generation, or perceived portfolio complexity (energy, industrials, consumer conglomerates, and certain tech hardware firms) attract activists. In 2025, energy and industrial names featured prominently as activists hunted simplification and value extraction, while consumer staples and logistics targets appeared where margin recovery or M&A opportunities were evident. Regions vary: the U.S. continued to lead in absolute campaigns, but cross-border US activists targeting European and Asian companies surged, leveraging valuation gaps abroad.

How investors should respond
For long-term investors, activism is a double-edged sword: it can unlock shareholder value through disciplined capital allocation, but can also induce short-term volatility and distract management. Practical steps include: (1) monitoring corporate governance indicators and activist vulnerability scores; (2) assessing balance-sheet flexibility and free cash flow conversion as predictors of activist interest; (3) engaging with management and boards early if issues arise; and (4) being selective about participating in campaigns — weighing expected incremental value versus execution risk and costs. Advisers and pension funds increasingly demand transparent outcomes metrics (e.g., ROIC improvement targets) when siding with or resisting activist proposals.

Conclusion
The record 61 campaigns in Q3 2025 mark an inflection point: activists are not only more numerous but also more tactically sophisticated. Their growing success in winning board seats and strategic concessions is reshaping corporate governance norms and forcing companies to be proactive on strategy and shareholder engagement. For markets, the activism surge amplifies the premium on disciplined capital allocation and clear strategic narratives — and it makes governance due diligence a central part of investment analysis in the modern era.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Sector Spotlight: Defence & Aerospace in India — A Growing Investment Theme

The growing role of private equity in defence: a $150bn rethink for the U.S. Army

Sector Spotlight: Defence & Aerospace in India — A Growing Investment Theme

Sector Spotlight: Defence & Aerospace in India — A Growing Investment Theme

India’s defence production reached an all-time high of ₹1.51 lakh crore in FY 2024–25 and defence exports rose to ₹23,622 crore (about US$2.76 billion), a 12.04% increase over FY 2023–24. These headline figures reflect a structural shift: domestic production is expanding rapidly and export orientation is rising. Private-sector firms now account for a growing share of production and exports, with the private sector contributing roughly ₹15,233 crore of FY25’s export total (≈64.5% of exports). The export-to-production ratio makes the point: ₹23,622 crore in exports against ₹1.51 lakh crore production implies exports are already ~15.6% of output, signalling a meaningful pivot from a pure domestic market to international customers. (Calculation: 23,622 / 151,000 ≈ 0.156 ≈ 15.6%.)

Tata’s helicopter push — a concrete example of capability building
A recent, high-visibility step is the Airbus–Tata initiative: Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) will establish India’s first private-sector helicopter final assembly line (FAL) for the Airbus H125 at Vemagal, Karnataka. The facility is intended to produce “Made in India” H125 helicopters with the first delivery targeted for early 2027, and Airbus/Tata plan to make these helicopters available for export across the South Asian region. This is emblematic: multinational OEMs are now embedding India into their global supply chains via local private partners. That facility matters for investors for three reasons: it demonstrates transfer of production technology and higher value-added assembly work being done in India; the prospect of recurring revenue through local MRO (maintenance, repair & overhaul) and spares; and an export angle that turns domestic capex into foreign-currency earning streams.

Policy tailwinds — why private capacity is scaling fast
The policy architecture since DPrP/Make-in-India reforms and subsequent defence production policies has explicitly incentivised private participation, technology partnerships, and exports. Government measures include liberalised FDI limits in defence manufacturing, faster approvals for transfers of technology, and focused industrial corridors (e.g., Uttar Pradesh Defence Industrial Corridor) that have attracted investment proposals exceeding ₹33,896 crore—evidence of concentrated capex commitments in manufacturing hubs. These policy moves lower barriers for players like Tata, Adani and others to scale production and invest in higher-value segments (airframes, avionics, helicopters). Public investment and clearer procurement roadmaps — together with predictable issuance of indigenisation lists and export targets — improve demand visibility. The Ministry of Defence and Invest India have set medium-term export targets (multi-year goals to increase defence exports to several times FY24 levels by the end of the decade), which encourages private capex with a market-access rationale.

Capital, margins and investment economics
From an investment lens, defence and aerospace manufacturing have these financial characteristics: high up-front capital expenditure (plant, tooling, certification), long inventory and receivable cycles (project timelines, government payment schedules), but attractive long-term margins once certification, ramp and aftermarket services are in place. Companies that capture assembly, spares and MRO chains can move from single-digit to mid-teens operating margins over time (company-specific, depending on product mix and localisation). Export contracts priced in USD also provide an FX hedge for rupee-based manufacturers when global demand is stable.
For investors, key ratios to watch are order-book to revenue (visibility), gross margin trajectory (localisation vs imported content), capex intensity (capex / sales) and free cash-flow conversion post-ramp. Defence firms with steady service revenues (MRO, training, spares) typically show stronger FCF conversion than pure systems integrators dependent on episodic contracts.

Export potential and global positioning
India’s aim to be a global defence supplier is supported by competitive labour costs, a maturing supplier base, and strategic pricing for markets in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Helicopters like the H125 — a versatile, proven platform — can open channels to civil and parapublic buyers (police, coast guard, EMS) in neighbouring markets. If TASL’s Karnataka FAL scales as planned, it can help create a local export hub for light helicopters — a product category with steady demand and recurring aftermarket revenue.

Risks and what investors should monitor
Key risks include payment and certification delays (government procurement cycles), dependence on imported critical subsystems (which affects margin potential), and geopolitical export controls that can limit market access for certain platforms. Investors should monitor order backlog transparency, localisation percentages (import content vs indigenised value), capex schedules, and government procurement guidelines (which materially affect demand timing).

Conclusion
India’s defence and aerospace sector has moved from policy promise to measurable scale: record production and export numbers, large greenfield investments in corridors, and concrete OEM-partner projects such as Tata’s H125 assembly line in Karnataka. For investors, the sector offers long-duration structural growth driven by policy support, export demand and private-sector scale-up — but it demands careful due diligence on order books, margins and execution timelines. The next few years will reveal which companies convert plant capex into sustainable free cash flow and export footprints; those that do are likely to outperform as India deepens its role as a global defence manufacturer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Safe Havens in 2025: Gold, Yen and Alternatives in a Volatile Year

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watchIndia’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

India’s primary-market calendar has come alive. Industry bankers and exchanges expect roughly $8 billion of new equity to hit the market in the final quarter of 2025, with a concentrated wave of large offerings scheduled for October and November. The pipeline is anchored by two marquee transactions: Tata Capital (price band ₹310–₹326; ~₹15,500–₹15,512 crore issue, the largest IPO of 2025) and LG Electronics India (price band ₹1,080–₹1,140; ~₹11,607 crore OFS), both opening in early October. The frenetic schedule would make Q4 2025 one of the busiest IPO quarters in recent memory.

The headline deals — size, pricing and implied valuations
Tata Capital set a price band of ₹310–₹326 (announced September 29, 2025), implying an offer that will raise roughly ₹15,500 crore and a post-issue valuation near ₹1.38 lakh crore. The deal combines fresh equity and promoter sales and aims to open to retail subscription in early October.
LG Electronics India fixed a price band of ₹1,080–₹1,140 and an offer-for-sale of ~10.18 crore shares (15% stake), valuing the listed entity at roughly ₹77,000–₹78,000 crore and raising about ₹11,600 crore if priced at the top. The IPO opens October 7, 2025, and is structured as an OFS by the Korean parent.

Financial context and valuation metrics investors should model
Looking beyond headline sizes matters. For LG Electronics India, FY24 financials show revenue ~₹21,352 crore and net profit ~₹1,511 crore (FY2024), which implies a trailing P/E near ~51x at a ~₹77,400 crore market cap — a premium that demands material future earnings growth or margin expansion to justify. Tata Capital, a diversified NBFC with FY25 earnings that rose materially (Livemint reports PAT ~₹3,655 crore for FY25), will face scrutiny on multiples vs. listed NBFC peers and on embedded credit cycle risks. Investors must therefore triangulate price band, trailing earnings and forward guidance rather than rely on headline demand alone.

Why the wave? demand drivers and market plumbing
Several forces are amplifying the window: heavy mutual fund inflows into Indian equities, strong retail participation in 2025 IPOs, and improved dealer / merchant banker confidence after a string of successful listings that delivered double-digit listing gains (2025 listings averaged meaningful first-day pops). Bankers also point to a tactical calendar: corporates prefer listing windows before year-end for index inclusion and to use positive sentiment to maximise pricing. Domestic liquidity, relatively benign global rates in recent months and active primary-market desks at brokerages have combined to create an IPO “sweet spot.”

Risks — concentration, valuations and liquidity strain
A cluster of large offers over a short window creates three principal risks. First, allocation crowding: retail and institutional pockets are finite; multiple large asks can lead to softer subscription for later deals. Second, rich pricing: several marquee names are seeking premium multiples (as seen with LG’s ~51x trailing P/E), raising the possibility of muted listing returns if growth disappoints. Third, liquidity and secondary pressure: large OFS segments (promoter exits) can introduce supply into the market after listing, weighing on near-term performance. Finally, macro shocks — e.g., an abrupt global risk-off, higher rates or domestic political noise — could quickly reverse investor sentiment.

Rewards — why long-term investors may still care
For long-term, selective investors, the wave presents opportunities: listed access to high-quality franchisees (large retail finance platforms, premium consumer brands, technology-enabled firms) at entry points that may still offer multi-year compound returns if execution holds. Some IPOs are strategic for sector allocation — financials (Tata Capital) for balance-sheet play, consumer durables (LG) for secular demand and distribution scaling. Institutional investors can secure meaningful allocations at anchor stages, while retail investors can use phased participation or SIP-style exposure via small lots to manage debut volatility.

What investors and advisers should watch
* Implied multiples vs. peers: compute trailing and forward P/E, P/B and RoA/RoE for each IPO.
* Use of proceeds/ OFS nature: is capital going into growth (fresh equity) or does it primarily monetise existing shareholders? OFS-heavy deals can signal immediate sellability.
* Anchor demand and subscription timing: strong anchor book builds often presage robust institutional support.
* Underlying business metrics: Net interest margin and asset quality for finance issuers; gross margins, channel economics and working-capital cycle for consumer names.
* Post-listing lock-ups and promoter intent: understand when sizeable promoter stakes might re-enter the market.

Conclusion
India’s projected $8 billion year-end IPO pipeline is a signal of market confidence and domestic investor capacity. Yet success will be measured deal by deal: pricing discipline, real earnings delivery and the market’s appetite for concentrated supply will determine whether October–December 2025 becomes a celebrated theme or a cautionary calendar. For disciplined investors, careful valuation work and staged participation will be the prudent path through the busiest IPO stretch in months.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

RBI raises loans-against-shares limit fivefold: will it meaningfully deepen market liquidity?