Menu

Editorials

BHEL Secures Major Power Project Contracts from Adani Group

Bhageria India reported a net profit of Rs. 2.38 cr.

Bhageria India reported a net profit of Rs. 2.38 cr.

The net sales were at Rs 108.12 crore in June 2022, down 4.33% from Rs 113.02 crore in June 2021. The quarterly net profit stood at Rs. 2.38 crore in June 2022, down 81.65% from Rs. 12.96 crore in June 2021. The EBITDA stands at Rs. 11.99 crore in June 2022, down 49.83% from Rs. 23.90 crore in June 2021.

Are retained earnings used effectively?

The company earned revenue of Rs.99.59 Cr from the chemical segment, Rs.8 Cr. from solar power and Rs.0.4 Cr. from other segments for the year ending in March 2021. The EBIT from the chemical segment was Rs. 2.43 Cr., Rs. 3.75 Cr. from the solar power segment and Rs. 0.86 from other. The company incurred a finance cost of Rs. 1.08 cr. and other unallocated expenditure of Rs. 2.38 cr. The surplus current assets suggest that Bhageria Industries has a conservative balance sheet and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Succinctly put, Bhageria Industries boasts net cash, so it’s fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load.

Any business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don’t cut it. Bhageria Industries has net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Bhageria Industries created free cash flow of 14% of its EBIT. That level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt. While it is always sensible to investigate a company’s debt, in this case, Bhageria Industries has 152.4m in net cash and a decent-looking balance sheet. So we are not troubled with Bhageria Industries’s debt use. However, not all investment risk resides on the balance sheet.

Valuations:

EPS is at Rs.0.55 for the June quarter as compared to Rs.4.17 in the March quarter and Rs.2.39 in the June 2021 quarter. The ROCE and ROE are at 19.2% and 14.7%, respectively. The EBITDA stood at 6.48x while the price to book ratio was at 1.46x. The stock was trading at a P/E ratio of 12.3x. The scrip was at Rs.170 on Thursday, up by 0.18%.

 

 

Hindalco Industries plans to invest Rs. 15,000 crore in Madhya Pradesh

ONCG made a profit of Rs. 15205 Cr.

ONCG made a profit of Rs. 15205 Cr.

ONCG reported a standalone profit of Rs 15,205.85 crore for the month of June 2022, up 251% compared to the year-ago period, driven by strong operating performance and top-line growth. The standalone profit in Q1 FY22 stood at Rs 4,334.75 crore. The standalone revenue for the June FY23 quarter grew by 84% to Rs 42,321 crore compared to the corresponding period last fiscal. ONGC had a 91% year-on-year growth in its offshore business at Rs 27,990.4 crore and its onshore business increased by 72% to Rs 14,330.3 crore during the quarter.

Consistent natural gas output

At 1.63 million tons, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) produced 1.7% less oil due to lower output from western offshore. The production decreased by 12.34% in fields run by private businesses. However, compared to April through July 2021, when output was 9.96 million tons, it was only slightly lower during the first four months of the current fiscal, which started on April 1. On August 4, Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri tweeted that the trend of diminishing crude oil production had changed. The data from the ministry showed that Vedanta’s Rajasthan block had a lower output than ONGC’s oilfields in Gujarat and Assam.

The natural gas output was nearly steady in July at 2.88 billion cubic metres but was 3.4% higher from April to July at 11.43 bcm. The refineries processed 83.96 million tonnes of crude oil between April and July, operating at 103.87% of their capacity, compared to an operating rate of 92.01% for processing 76.64 million tons. Fuel production increased by 6.23% in July to 21.97 million tonnes and by 11.67% from April to July to 90 million tons.

The company has fixed August 19th, 2022 as the “Record Date” for determining members eligible to receive a final dividend of 3.25 per share (i.e., @ 65%) for the financial year 2021-22.

Valuations:

The EPS stood at Rs. 12.09 for Q1 FY23. The price to book ratio was at 0.73x. The return on assets was at 12.3%. The interest coverage ratio was 24x for June 2021. The EBITDA was at 2.50x. The ROCE and ROE were at 18.0% and 18.2%, respectively. The stock is trading at 3.35x while the five-year P/E ratio is at 7.51x. The scrip closed at Rs.136, up by 1.68% on Wednesday.

 

Easing of risk weights on loans given to MFIs and NBFCs

DCB Bank’s (DCBB) Q1 FY23 earnings

DCB Bank’s (DCBB) Q1 FY23 earnings:

The PAT for DCB bank was at Rs. 97 cr. in comparison to Rs. 34 cr. from the same quarter a year ago, with a growth of 188%. Total revenue in the June quarter was Rs. 949 Cr., compared to Rs. 920 Cr. in March 2021 and Rs. 846 Cr. in June 2021. There was an 18% growth in advances YOY and a 14% growth in deposits. The Gross NPA as on June 2022 was at 4.21% while the Net NPA was at 1.82 qoq as on June 2022. Both Gross NPA and Net NPA declined sequentially as well as in comparison to last year.

Ratios to improve in the June quarter:

The Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) was at 69.480 and the PCR without considering Gold Loans NPAs was at 73.39%. The Capital Adequacy Ratio was at 18.47%, with Tier I at 15.44% and Tier ll at 3.03% as per norms. The CASA (Current Account Savings Account) ratio was at 29% in the June quarter compared to 27% in the previous quarter. The savings account balances between 2 lakh and less than 5 lakh rupees had an interest rate of 5.00%, while balances between 5 lakh and less than 10 lakh rupees had an interest rate of 6.00%. On savings account balances between 10 lakh and less than 25 lakh, there is an interest rate of 6.75%. DCB Bank has given a maximum interest rate of 7% on savings account balances between 25 lakh and less than 2 crore. Savings accounts with balances of between 2 crore and less than 50 crore will now earn interest at a rate of 5.50%, while accounts with balances of over 50 crore will now earn interest at a rate of 5.00%.

Due to lower credit costs and better loan growth, gross slippages continued to remain elevated, mainly stemming from the gold portfolio, largely offset by higher recovery and upgrades, resulting in a GNPA of 4.3%. The stress pool continues to remain sticky, but the management expects improving collection efficiency to reflect in better asset quality on the back of a granular and secured portfolio of approximately 95%. With asset quality still stubborn and loan growth looking soft, there is less room for any positive surprise from operating efficiency.

Valuations:

The price to book ratio stood at 0.64x. The return on assets was 0.68%. The interest coverage ratio was 1.22x for June 2021. The return on capital employed was at 6.30% while the return on equity was at 7.37%. The EBITDA was recorded at 14.0x. The (CAR) capital adequacy ratio continues to be strong at 18.47%. The scrip was trading at Rs. 83.1, down by 0.54% on Wednesday.

Everest Kanto reported a total revenue of Rs. 380 Cr.

Insecticide India reports a net profit of Rs. 38 Cr.

Insecticide India reports a net profit of Rs. 38 Cr.

In the June quarter, Insecticide India reported total sales of Rs. 561 Cr. The company’s net profit stood at Rs 38 crores as compared to Rs 22 crores in the March quarter. EBITDA was 66 crores in Q1 FY23, compared to 42 crores in Q4 FY22 and 61 crores in Q1 FY22, with EBITDA margins contracting to 90 basis points. In the first quarter of FY23, B2C, B2B, and exports contributed 66%, 29%, and 5%, respectively. The better product mix, coupled with price hikes in the recent past, led to a gross margin improvement of 70bps. The Institutional (B2B) category grew by +30% YoY in 1Q.

New launches to increase demand:

Insecticide India has launched 3 new products in 1Q and intends to launch another 6 products in FY23E. There is a CAPEX of Rs1.1bn largely behind, and the technical synthesis plant is to commence at the end of the year. Going forward, we expect the business to pick up with new launches, a better margin profile of in-licensing, the inauguration of new capacities, and backward integration projects. The management expects double-digit revenue growth with at least 100 bps improvements in margins to be led by better contributions from new product launches and superior product mix in FY23E.

In 1Q FY23, the ITI (innovation turnover index) index was at 12.2%. They have recently received four patents for fungicides and pesticides, with a few more patents to be granted in the subsequent quarters. The company launched 3 new products in 1QFY23: Torry (Maize herbicide), Sargent Xpress (insecticide), and Himax (non-selective weedicide). While the revenues from the recently launched products in FY22-Hachiman, Oxim, and Shinwa grew 3x in 1QFY23. There has been a marginal increase in the CAPEX budget on account of inflationary costs and non-budgeted incidental expenditures. The technical synthesis plant at Dahej is expected to commence operations by the end of 1HFY23. We expect similar growth momentum in FY24. However, the company lowered export revenue guidance by 25% to Rs. 150 crore.

Valuation:

The EPS  stood at Rs.54.0, while the stock is trading at a P/E of 18.5X. The 5-year P/E stood at 11.2x. The EBITDA was at 11.6x and the interest coverage ratio was at 25.7x. The ROCE was at 16% and the ROE was at 12.7%. The scrip closed at Rs.1000, down by 1.06% on Tuesday.

 

 

Equity Right

Government allows Indian public companies to directly list shares overseas.

Government allows Indian public companies to directly list shares overseas.

 

Government’s vision for betterment of Indian companies:

In late January 2020 Government of India communicated to media that they are planning to allow direct listing of Indian companies in foreign markets. This will help Indian companies to not only rely on domestic markets but they can also raise capital on large scale from various foreign markets which will help companies in diversification and growth. This move can directly help Indian companies in increasing their turnover and profits.

Till now Indian companies go for the depository receipts to attract investors globally but this is bit unfamiliar amongst the investors globally and been less attractive in recent years. A minimum of 15 Indian companies currently attract foreign investors via ADR’s and GDR’s. These companies includes Reliance Industry, HDFC Bank, Infosys and many others.

 

Green signal by Indian Government:

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced an economic package of ₹ 20 lakh crore under government’s Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan. This is done for the revival of Indian Economy. It is an umbrella of massive ₹ 20 lakh crore economic booster package. The government ensured to provide some relaxation in all the sectors.

To improve “ease of doing business” in India, government allowed Indian public companies to list their shares in foreign markets. This provision will help Indian companies for better valuations, rapid growth and expand their businesses on a large scale. This move will help Indian companies to get funds at a cheaper rate from various foreign markets. This will directly help Indian economy to recuperate in a speedy way.

Government noted private companies that listed Non-convertible debentures (NCDs) on Indian stock exchanges not to be considered as listed companies. It is also expected that this provision is to prevent Indian companies to register themselves in foreign markets like Singapore and London for raising a fund and going global.

 

Existing vs proposed rule:

The existing rule states that companies which are listed on Indian stock markets can only list their company in foreign markets. Whereas, new proposed rule states that there is no compulsion for it. Indian companies can list themselves directly in various foreign markets to raise capital.

Until now, only American Depository Receipt (ADR’s) and Global Depository Receipt (GDR’s) can collect capital from foreign market sources. At least 15 Indian companies follow this mechanism to raise capital from foreign markets. However, this is not much familiar amongst the global investors. To eradicate this the new provision will allow Indian companies to a fresh new issue of shares or sale of existing holdings.

 

Rules and regulation:

All the required rules and regulation for listing an Indian company at abroad will be notified soon by the government. Once the provisions to the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and Company Law Regulations are passed. Media noted Indian foreign exchange control laws do not require free capital convertibility, and there are other regulatory limits on capital account transactions.

Nevertheless, this proposal has been under discussion for a couple of years between stakeholders and regulators, especially regarding the selection of foreign jurisdiction. SEBI had indicated in 2018 that this route would be open only to the financially sound companies, so that the mechanism could not be used for exploitation. Sources indicated that final rules in this respect would probably be based on the Financial Action Task Force’s recommendations.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman noted, this provision of direct listing. If Indian public companies are not available over the globe but will be allowed in permissible jurisdictions.

 

Precautionary measures:

However, the approval will not come without any protections. The Indian government is likely to go along with the recommendations raised by SEBI in 2018. This requires a direct listing of Indian companies in abroad. It had suggested 10 overseas jurisdictions, including the US, UK, Japan, China, Hong Kong and South Korea for Indian companies to list. The selection was based on the fact that these jurisdictions are part of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), The Anti-Money Laundering Global Task Force (GTF-AML) and IOSCO.

SEBI also suggested that this provision should be available only for financially stable . This will aid  to minimize frauds and manipulation. The firms with a  paid-up capital of 10% will be allowed to list in the foreign market.

The provision of capital raising in an overseas market can also have an impact on the Indian currency market. Since the flow of overseas capital can put pressure on the Indian currency and may lead to volatility. RBI and SEBI can be jointly involved to check this.

 

 

 

LTFH Q1FY24: Retail Portfolio Grows 31% YoY, Reaches ₹84,444 Cr

MSME definition to be widened further.

MSME definition to be widened further.

Government considers further broadening of the definition of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). With a vision to extend various official benefits to small businesses and to make sure that their schemes reach the maximum eligible firms, government is trying to pull as many micro, small and medium businesses as possible under the ambit of the definition of MSME.

The original definition:

Definition of MSME used to define micro units as having investment not more than Rs 25 lakh, small unit having investment between Rs 25 lakh -Rs 5 cr and medium one having investment between Rs 5 cr – Rs 10 cr. And in case of services, investment in a micro enterprise was must up to Rs 10 lakh in equipment, for that of small enterprise between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 2 cr and that of medium between Rs 2 cr – Rs 5 cr bracket. While announcing the Rs 20 lakh cr economic package, it was announced that definition of MSME shall be amended by making alterations in the both, the investment limits as well as in the annual turnover figures.

According to the new definition of MSME that had announced along with the economic package announcement, micro units were to be defined as those units whose investment does not exceed Rs 1 cr and have annual turnover limit Rs 5 crore, while a small enterprise shall be the one having investment between Rs 5 crore and Rs 10 crore and annual turnover limit of Rs 50 crore and medium units to have investment between Rs 10 cr – Rs 20 cr and annual turnover of Rs 100 cr. Government also made it clear that MSMEs should now cover both manufacturing and service enterprises alike.

Now the above definition stands further changes in limits:

MSME and Transport Minister, Nitin Gadkari mentions to media that the ministry is planning to increase the recently set annual turnover limit of Rs 100 cr for medium enterprises to Rs 250cr, this 250cr limit of turnover may also exclude export sales for the purpose of calculation of eligibility of the firm.
With the same intension the investment limit to qualify the definition of medium enterprise under MSME has been proposed to increase to Rs 50 cr from Rs 20 cr.

The two suggestions mentioned above are pending for approval from Ministry of Finance:

This move shall also motivate those MSMEs that fell in the earlier brackets of limitations to now explore and take risks to further expand and make more investments and enhance turnovers, as they shall be able to avail the same benefits even after growing a little big. This move shall therefore lead to witnessing growth in this sector. The NSS survey of 2015-16 reveals the count of MSMEs in India, totaling to 6.34 cr, comprising of around 6.3 crore micro units, while 3.31 lakh small and 5,000 medium firms.

 

What is on platter for the MSMEs?

On achieving the status of MSMEs, businesses would get assorted benefits like periodic governmental and regulatory relief, besides 25 per cent of official blocking of loans under priority sector lending programmes. Further, as per the conditions, these shall be eligible for enjoying recently announced benefits like additional collateral free working capital loan up to 20 per cent having guaranteed capital of Rs 3 lakh cr. Rs 20,000 cr and Rs 50,000 cr funds to further boost equity base of these small business that have growth potential.

According to the government, the collateral-free loan alone is expected to aid 45 lakh MSME units. There shall be different rules relating to insolvency for MSMEs. Promoters who are not the willful defaulters shall be allowed to bid for their stressed assets whereas large companies are not allowed to do the same. In FY19, 42,458 MSMEs together enabled central public sector firms to procure 30 per cent of their procurement worth Rs 33,264 cr. Further, MSME Ministry had also revealed that these businesses are known to have created 11.10 cr job opportunities in FY16 and MSMEs form 29 per cent of the total GDP.

 

 

 

Real estate equity waterfall

Real estate equity waterfall : How they work and what to look for.

Real estate equity waterfall : How they work and what to look for.

 

Equity Waterfall:

When we buy a property, we choose a combination of equity and debt to fund it. In exchange for their equity investment, our buyers are entitled to the profit and revenue of the real estate. The waterfall determines how earnings and profits are split between you and our investors.

The layout of the waterfall may vary from one contract to another, and it is necessary to look at the specifics of each agreement to evaluate if the separation is equal and fair for all the parties concerned. All information is presented in a contract called an operating agreement, that will be thoroughly and carefully reviewed in anticipation of the allocation of capital to the real estate deal. A waterfall, also known as a waterfall model, is a legal term included in an operating agreement which specifies how money is paid out, where it is paid out, and to when it is paid out during real estate equity transactions.

 

Waterfall Features:

1. Preferred Returns:

Preferred returns are described as the first claim benefit of the project before the target return is achieved. Preferred return simply generates another cash fund stream, and after the cash flow has been allocated to preferred owners, the remaining stream capital transfers to the next stage and divides as decided.

 

2. Lookback Provisions:

Lookback clauses are used as cash flow is distributed before the asset is disposed of. If the Limited Partners do not get a guaranteed rate of return decided upon settlement, the General Partner is forced to offer up a percentage of the cash income that was allocated to them before the transaction.

 

3. Catchup Provisions:

A catch-up clause ensures the Joint Partner 100 percent of the profits of the agreement before the negotiated rate of return is reached. If the specific rate of return has been met, all the residual earnings should go to the General Partner before the defined rate of return has been reached.

 

Operating agreement:

1. Members:

The partners of the agreement are those who are eligible to benefit from the successful transaction of the real estate. In certain instances, there seems to be a variety of limited partners and general partner. The GP is liable for identifying the opportunity, reviewing it, acquiring it, completing it, and handling the asset until the sale is complete. Usually, the GP will invest a limited portion of the total equity used to fund the deal. The LP’s are purely individual investors. They put their money with the GP and hope to obtain it back, plus a profit, from the cash flow produced by the real estate. The LPs offer the remaining of the capital required to finance the transaction.

 

2. Capital:

If the cash flow generated by the estate fails to reach the necessary return threshold in a specified period, the cash flow shortfall can or can not be carried forward to the next year. If the investor ‘s financial flows are accumulated, the deficit will continue over the following cycle before the cash flow is adequate to clear it. Cumulative cash holdings are beneficial to the LPs as it ensures that the GP does not obtain any funds before the deficit is erased. When the capital investments are not combined, they are more beneficial to the GP.

 

3. The Return Hurdles:

Return hurdle is the rates of return at which the capital investment divides between the LP and GP varies. These are designed to enable the GP to manage properties as profitably as practical. The better the profit that the property makes, the more income the GP gets to earn compared to their original investment.

 

4. Calculating Returns:

The return hurdle can be evaluated using several different approaches, although the two most popular are the multiple of equity and the internal rate of return. The internal cost of the return is the average discount rate, which determines the net present value of the potential cash flows, equal to zero, negative, and positive. The capital multiple is measured as the ratio of the capital received to the money invested and represented as a sum out of the second decimal point.

 

5. Simple Split:

The final way of deciding the configuration of a waterfall is a straightforward break and might have no desired return to investors. For example, 50 percent of all capital investment and profit is paid to LP and 50 percent of all capital investment is paid to the GP. This is popular in purchases where there might not be a high degree of complexity or a lot of costs, so the goal is to make distributions very easy.

The profitability of an investment from the investor’s point of view of return can rely on well-defined allocations that are properly distributed to the appropriate entities also during the investment holding period.

 

 

 

BEML Surges by 7.86% on Likely Upgrade to Navratna Status

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd Q1 FY23 Result Update: Net profit jumps to Rs. 2,771 crores.

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd Q1 FY23 Result Update: Net profit jumps to Rs. 2,771 crores.

On 15th July 2022, JSPL reported a net profit of Rs. 2770.88 crores as against the net profit of Q1 FY22 at Rs. 14.25 crores. The net profit increased on account of higher income. The total revenue increased from Rs. 10,643.17 crores in the March quarter to Rs. 13,069.17 in the June quarter. The revenue was up by 23% YoY.

The output of steel remained almost flat at 1.99 million tonnes (MT) as compared to 2.01 MT in April-June 2021. However, there was a fall by 6% QoQ . The sale of steel stood at 1.74 MT against 1.61 MT a year ago and was down by 16% QoQ. The key divers foe the fall of the sale was the challenging marketing conditions and the imposition of export duty. Due to the imposition of the export duty, the domestic volume fell by 12% and export volume slipped by 28%. During the June quarter, the realization was higher by 10% QoQ.

Expenses were also higher at Rs 10,566.64 crore as against Rs 7,233.55 in Q1 FY22. The costs grew by 10% due to the increase in the prices of coking coal by 33% and thermal coal by 27%.

The EBITDA margin during this quarter is 42.8% as compared to the previous quarter at 26.4%

In Mozambique, the company’s Chirodzi mine produced 0.93 MT ROM (run of mine) and sold 197 KT (kilo tonne) coking coal. Mozambique operations have reported an EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of Rs. 334 crores for 1QFY23, driven by higher sales volumes and realisations. During April-June, Kiepersol mine in South Africa reported production of 146 KT ROM, and sales of 74 KT. The mine reported EBITDA of Rs. 84 crores. for the quarter. The company’s Russel Vale mine located in Australia produced 138 KT ROM, and dispatched 79 KT coking coal. The mine reported EBITDA of Rs. 24 crores for the quarter.

JSP’s 1QFY23 standalone Gross revenues of Rs. 14,541Cr declined by 7% Q-o-Q and up by 27% YoY as lower volumes more than offset the benefit from higher realisations. Notwithstanding higher input costs, 1QFY23 Adjusted EBITDA of INR 2,865Cr was 8% higher Q-o-Q and fell by 35% Y-o-Y. Q1FY23 Adjusted Profit after tax (PAT) of INR 2,072Cr (Adjusted for exceptional) increased 44% Q-o-Q and slipped by -22% Y-o-Y on higher operating profit and lower finance costs. Pellet production of 1.92mt declined 11 % Y-o-Y (-3% Q-o-Q) due to negligible external sales (30KT vs. 400KT in 1QFY21)

Consolidated Gross Revenues fell 8% Q-o-Q to INR 14,738Cr (+26% Y-o-Y), driven by lower steel and pellet sales partially offset by higher realisations. Adjusted EBITDA of INR 2,993Cr was higher by 3% Q-o-Q but declined 32% Y-o-Y due to rise in input costs and unfavourable base in the prior year (low cost iron ore inventory available in 1QFY22). 1QFY23 Adjusted Profit after tax declined by 23% Y-o-Y (+5% Q-o-Q) to INR 1,929Cr on the back of lower operating profit, partially offset by lower finance costs. Funds from JPL divestment has further strengthened JSP’s balance sheet with Consolidated Net Debt declining further by INR 1,149Cr in 1QFY23 to end the quarter at INR7,727Cr. Net Debt to EBITDA has improved to 0.54x from 0.57x in Q4 FY22.

 

On 18th July 2022, the shares of the company are trading at Rs. 351.50 , up by 6 points or by 1.74%. The shares previously closed at Rs. 345.50 and opened today at Rs. 349.05. The market cap of JSPL is Rs. 35,856 crores. The stock hit an intraday high of Rs. 353 and intraday low of Rs. 341.95.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mindtree Q1 FY23 Result Update: Net Profit jumps 37% YoY to Rs. 472 crores.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Krishna Institute reported a net profit of Rs. 79 Cr.

Mindtree Q1 FY23 Result Update: Net Profit jumps 37% YoY to Rs. 472 crores.

Mindtree Q1 FY23 Result Update: Net Profit jumps 37% YoY to Rs. 472 crores.

 

On 13th July 2022, Mindtree reported 37.3% rise in the consolidated net profit on YoY basis for the June 2022 quarter. The net profit increased from Rs. 343 cr. to Rs. 471.6 cr. However, on quarterly basis the net profit slipped by 0.3% from Rs. 473.1 cr in the previous quarter. There is an increase in the revenue of 36.2% year-on-year to Rs 3,121.1 crore during April-June 2022. Revenue fell by 7.7% as against the March 2022 quarter with Rs. 2897.4 cr

In terms of dollars, the company reported a revenue of $399.3 million, a growth of 28.6% and 4%QoQ. Its net profit was $60.3 million, a jump of 29.7% y-o-y and a decline of 3.8% q-o-q. This was sixth consecutive quarter of more than 5% growth in constant currency.

The company’s highest revenue of 76.8% came from North America, followed by APAC and Middle East (8.6%), Continental Europe (7.9%), and the UK and Ireland (6.8%).

The communications, media, and tech contributed the highest to Mindtree’s revenue in Q1 with 44.1% of the overall revenue. Retail, CPG, and manufacturing contributed 19.8% and banking, financial services and insurance about 18.6%; travel & transportation and hospitality & healthcare contributed 15.4% and 2% respectively.

 

The company signed a contract of $570 million during the June quarter, the highest ever for the company.

The company’s EBIT margin is 21.1% compared to 18.9% QoQ and 17.7% YoY. Investments and cash stood at an all-time high of $500 million

For the June quarter, the attrition is 24.5%, up from 23.8% in the March quarter and higher than Q1 FY22 recorded at 13.7%. However, the EBITDA improved to 8.2% QoQ.

 

According to Debashis Chatterjee, chief executive officer and managing director of Mindtree, the company’s order book in the June quarter was the highest ever.

As of June 30, 2022, the company had 274 active clients.

The company has received no objection letter from the stock exchange for the merger of Mindtree and L&T Infotech. The merger is on the way to regulatory approvals. According to Debashis Chatterjee, the synergies between Mindtree and LTI are already producing results and this quarter has allowed them to win a large deal from a large European-based travel technology company.

 

On 13th July 2022, the shares of Mindtree closed at Rs. 2900.60. Next day the opening price was Rs. 2960. The stock hit an intraday high of Rs. 2961. Currently, the shares are trading at Rs. 2771, down by 129.80 points or by 4.55%.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indigo to “rationalise” salaries of technicians following mass sick leave.

Loan growth, higher margins, and lower costs to drive bank bottom lines in Q1.

NBFCs and HFCs securitization volumes almost doubled.

Anthropic Reaches $3 Billion in Revenue During AI Surge!

Anand Rathi Wealth Q1 Results: Net profit up 34% to Rs 40 cr; revenue rises 36%.

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Q1 Results: Net profit up 34% to Rs 40 cr; revenue rises 36%.

On 12th July 2022, Anand Rathi Wealth reported a net profit of Rs. 39.7 crores for the Q1 FY23. The net profit was up by 33.6% as compared to the net profit of Rs. 29.7 crores in Q1 FY21. This was due to the addition of new clients and strong net flows. The net profit improved by 16% QoQ which was Rs. 34 crores. Net Flows for the quarter stood at Rs. 1,355 crores, up by 395% over same the period last year.

The company’s revenue rose by 35.7% YoY to Rs. 133.5 crores. The revenue during Q1 FY21 was Rs. 98.4 crore. The revenue was up by 17% QoQ to Rs. 110 crores.

The company has recorded strong growth for the June quarter despite challenging market situations.

The Asset Under Management (AUM) of the company for this quarter stood at Rs 32,961 crore, up by15% YoY and 0.27% QoQ. During Q1FY21 and Q4 FY22 the Asset Under Management was Rs. 27,887 crore and Rs. 32,054 crores respectively.

The total operating expenses have increased from Rs. 7067.24 lakhs to Rs. 8062.03 lakhs as compared to the previous quarter. The operating cost is up by 40.3% YoY. This was majorly due to higher employee expenses and fixed costs.

The employee expenses were up from Rs. 52 crores to Rs. 60 crores on a QoQ basis.

Mostly the RM’s expenditures or the provisioning are linked to the revenue. If you look at the revenue, it is in terms of percentage, there is hardly any change. Last year employee benefit expenses were about 45% and it is in the same range even in this financial year. So at the absolute number, it looks higher. But compared with the revenue number in terms of percentage, it is more or less the same.

There was an increase in fixed cost by 17% YoY, because now since offices are running and administrative expenses, business promotional expenses and all have come on track. So this was the normal operating first quarter post-COVID era.

The PBT margin for this quarter is 39.6% as compared to the last quarter (40.2%).

For the June quarter, the return on equity is 42.3%, and for Q1 FY22 and Q4 FY22, 44.3% and 39.8% respectively.

The Earning Per Share for this quarter is Rs. 9.5. The active clients increased 17.4% to 7,477.

 

Anand Rathi Wealth, got listed in December. The company operates in the financial services industry with a focus on mutual fund distribution and the sale of financial products.
The company started its activities in fiscal 2002 and is a registered AMFI (Association of Mutual Funds of India) mutual fund distributor.

Currently, the stock is trading at Rs. 639.45. The share price went down by 9.95 points or by 1.52% as compared to the previous close of Rs.649.45. On 15 July 2022, the stock opened at Rs. 653. The shares hit an intraday high and low of Rs. 655.65 and 638 respectively. The company’s market cap is Rs. 2661 crore.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIC plans to sell RCap bonds worth Rs 3,400 crore hit another roadblock.