Investment Strategies in an Era of Tariffs: India’s Emerging Role in Global Trade Networks
In 2025, the U.S. has imposed a range of aggressive tariff policies. An effective average tariff rate of 18.6% is estimated for goods entering the U.S. by August 2025 — the highest since 1933. These tariffs include blanket 10% duties, steep reciprocal tariffs, as well as targeted rates of 50% on steel/aluminum and 25% on autos/parts, depending on origin. Such tariffs raise input costs, distort global sourcing, and inject uncertainty into planning for multinationals. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) warns that the full impact is still unfolding: many firms are absorbing the shock via thinner margins or inventory buffers, but over time capital investment and trade volumes may suffer. In a BlackRock analysis, the increased policy uncertainty is cited as a dampener on corporate capex: firms may delay or curtail longer-horizon investments until clarity returns.
Trade diversion and supply chain “rewiring”
Tariffs increase the cost of moving goods across borders, especially intermediate parts and components. As a result, some firms are shifting or diversifying supply chains away from high-tariff regions toward more tariff-friendly or trade-advantaged jurisdictions. This is often described as the “China + 1” strategy, but now evolving toward “Asia + India / Southeast Asia” nodes. One empirical insight: firms exposed to longer delivery delays (driven by tariffs, border friction, inspections) tend to raise inventory levels (higher inventory/sales ratios) to buffer supply uncertainty. A recent model estimates delivery delays have increased by ~21 days for foreign inputs, which has led to ~2.6% drop in output and ~0.4% increase in costs purely from logistics drag. Trade policy also encourages substitution in sourcing: where Chinese components were dominant, firms are now trying to source from lower tariff jurisdictions or localize. But this reallocation is uneven because many global value chains (GVCs) remain deeply China-embedded, especially in upstream parts and semiconductors. The structural inertia in these upstream chains can slow the movement away from China.
India as a new hub: evidence behind the 60% figure
Multiple surveys and trade reports back up the claim that over 60% of firms from the U.S., U.K., China and Hong Kong intend to expand trade with India. For example, Standard Chartered’s “Future of Trade: Resilience” report finds this share, reflecting corporate intent to reorient supply chains and trade flows. The “India emerges as top market” report underscores that nearly half of surveyed multinational corporations plan to ramp up trade or maintain trade activity with India over the next 3–5 years.
India’s domestic policies are also reinforcing the shift:
* India’s Production Linked Incentive (PLI) programs have been successful in drawing in global electronics and manufacturing players. As of FY25, reported FDI inflows tied to PLI across sectors reached US$81 billion despite headwinds in traditional FDI flows.
* In corporate surveys, 27% of Indian firms say they are shifting supply chains to India, compared with 20% globally saying they are reshoring to domestic bases.
Furthermore, Apple is a prime example: it is actively relocating part of its U.S-bound iPhone production from China to India and Vietnam as a response to tariff and geopolitical pressures. These data points suggest India is not merely a passive beneficiary but an active node in supply chain realignment.
What it means for investors — sector and country risk tilts
Some industries are more tariff-sensitive and thus more vulnerable to shocks and disruption:
* Commodities and raw materials: steel, aluminum, chemical intermediates, mining inputs – often these face steep tariffs or countervailing duties.
* Auto, auto components, and machinery: high import content in parts means tariffs can severely erode margins.
* Consumer electronics and appliances: supply chains are transnational; components sourced globally.
* Apparel, textiles, leather goods: especially from high export economies, they are frequently tariffed or subject to quotas.
These sectors are more at risk of margin compression, higher input costs, supply disruptions, or relocation pressures.
Opportunity zones
Conversely, regions and sectors that can attract relocated supply chains may gain:
* India (and neighboring Southeast Asia) stands out, given intent from major global firms, policy backing (PLI, ease of doing business), and ample labor & capacity potential.
* Logistics, warehousing, ports, cold-chains in India may see uptick as trade flows reorient.
* Industrial parks, SEZs, and modular manufacturing facilities designed for import substitution or export competitiveness.
* Input manufacturing (chemicals, basic materials, metal fabrication) in India to replace imports.
* IT/servicing, back-end assembly, final testing & packaging centers in India may grow as firms look to reduce tariff incidence on finished goods.
Strategies for investors
* Country exposure calibration: In equities or emerging-market portfolios, increase weight in Indian or ASEAN names with strong domestic or export orientation; reduce exposure in tariff-vulnerable export nations.
* Supply chain due diligence in portfolio companies: scrutinize firms’ import dependency, tariff exposure, origin of components, ability to switch suppliers or localize.
* Thematic asset picks: Logistics, industrial real estate (warehouses, export-oriented districts), and input producers in rising hubs are potential beneficiaries.
* Hedging & optionality: Use marine shipping, commodity futures, or trade-policy derivatives (if available) to hedge downside in high-tariff environments.
Key caveats & risks
* Political backlash / protectionism: As India grows, it may also erect its barriers or quality control orders (QCOs) which can hamstring sourcing.
* Regulatory friction and red tape: While India is attractive, permit delays, tax regimes, infrastructure constraints may slow relocation or raise costs.
* Infrastructure gaps: Power, logistics, port capacity, connectivity may remain bottlenecks and weaken the advantage.
* Tariff volatility and retaliation cycles: If tariffs stabilize or are reversed, the reorientation incentive may fade.
* Overvaluation risk: The “reallocation narrative” may already be priced into some emerging market / India names, making valuation discipline critical.
Conclusion
U.S. tariffs in 2025 have risen to historic levels (effective ~18.6%), pushing firms to reevaluate supply chains and relocate parts of their trade footprint. Over 60% of global firms in major economies are planning to expand trade with India, aligning with India’s PLI incentives and manufacturing reforms. Investors should analyze sector-level tariff exposure and seek to tilt toward regions and asset classes likely to benefit from realignment—while watching policy reversals and infrastructure gaps carefully.
The image added is for representation purposes only
