Menu

Small Finance Banks

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

 

Microfinance sector in India recorded non-performing assets (NPAs) of Rs. 50,000 crore at the end of December, 2024. The NPAs of the microfinance sector is about 13 percent of the gross credits. Despite the efforts of RBI to mitigate risk by lowering capital allocation requirements for risky unsecured loans, the NPAs of the microfinance sector hit an all-time high record of Rs. 50,000 crore.

 

Hike in portfolio at risk (PAR)

The portfolio at risk which could convert into NPA surged to 3.2 percent of the total credit. It was only 1 percent last year. Overall scenario of the microfinance loan portfolio indicates serious concerns about the credit discipline prevailing in the sector. 

 

Cautious Approach

In the midst of a hike in NPAs and the portfolio at risk in the microfinance segment, industry leaders in the market are looking at the future with a careful approach. Managing director of IndusInd Bank, Sumant Kathpalia said that the bank continues to have a prudent approach in terms of the microfinance segment. He stated that the bank’s customer base is indicating early signs of stability and it will be highlighted in the first quarter of the financial year 2026. Though, there is a probability of a rise in slippages in the upcoming quarter of the financial year 2025. 

 

Total share of NPA in microfinance segment

According to the information of Crif High Mark, the total proportion of NPAs, which are due for more than 90 days in the microfinance segment, is about 13 percent.  The total credit not paid for about 91 to 180 days accounts to 3.3 percent of the total loans. Also, the loans not paid for more than 180 days are recorded at 9.7 percent of the total loans.

 

The information does not include the data for the previous six months. It is likely for NPAs of the microfinance sector to hike to 14 percent of total loans or Rs. 56,000 crore, if the previous six months’ data is added to it. 

 

Performance of microfinance sector

In the past three quarters of the financial year, the microfinance sector in India recorded contraction in growth. Even though lenders tried to clean up their financial records by writing off bad assets. Another reason for this subdued performance is giving too many credits to low-income borrowers in order to achieve high growth quickly. It led to further expansion in defaults in the microfinance sector. 

 

Microfinance credit is generally given to women from low-income households with income less than Rs. 3 lakh on yearly basis. These loans usually do not have any collateral leading to becoming risky in terms of economic issues. 

 

Effect on Financial institutions and banks

The hike in NPAs in the microfinance sector indicates high risk for banks largely operating in unsecured lending segments. Though, every unsecured credit does not come in the microfinance sector. Some of the banks with large unsecured loans and currently facing high pressure in the loan segment are IDFC First, RBL Bank, Bandhan Bank, and IndusInd Bank. In the past, Bandhan Bank was a microfinance institution which later changed into a universal bank. At the present times, the bank has about Rs. 56,120 crore of unsecured loan portfolio and 7.3 percent of these unsecured loans are NPAs at the end of December, 2024. 

 

Recently RBI took the decision to lower capital requirement on micro loans given to MFIs to about 75 percent, which was earlier 125 percent. It aided in releasing more capital for creditors to lend and expand their businesses. The unsecured loans offered for the purpose of consumption remain at 100 percent of capital requirement.

 

Major Concerns of small finance banks and NBFCs

Due to the rising NPAs and potential risk of NPAs in microfinance lending, small finance banks like Utkarsh and ESAF recorded net losses in the third quarter. Small finance banks like Ujjivan, Equitas, Jana, and Suryoday recorded contraction in net profits by about 64 percent, 67 percent, 18 percent, and 42 percent on YoY basis, respectively, in the third quarter.

 

In terms of NPAs in microfinance loans in universal banks is recorded to be around 15.7 percent. On the other hand, total NPAs in microfinance loans in small finance banks stood at 18.3 percent. 

 

NBFC-MFIs like Spandana and Fusion broke their financial agreement due to recording quarterly losses in a row. The main reasons for these losses were expansion in the number of bad loans and hike in funding costs. 

 

In the past, the microfinance sector acted as a main driver for financial inclusion in the economy. It is now facing serious concerns as lenders are unable to balance both asset quality and growth of the finance institutions. 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Deal-making in the Indian Hospital Segment booming

 

 

 

 

RBI concerns over Small Finance Banks

RBI concerns over Small Finance Banks

RBI concerns over Small Finance Banks

Overview
It has been reported that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has become uneasy about a few small financing banks (SFBs) because of increased asset quality stress and excessive concentration risks.

According to three executives monitoring the industry, the banking regulator has also instructed these banks to look into mergers in order to increase their size and reduce the risks of concentration. According to one of the individuals, the RBI has “close supervision” over small finance institutions. Additionally, one solution that has been considered at the regulatory level to alleviate the issues is bank consolidation.

According to another executive, the regulator met with these lenders’ management a few months ago. The supervisory stakeholders were also concerned about gaps in succession planning and corporate governance at several of these SFBs.

NPAs on the rise
Due to the continuous strain in the microfinance industry, which saw the average gross non-performing assets (NPA) increase to an 18-month high of 11.6% at the end of September 2024, small financing institutions with a larger percentage of microloans are in the most difficult position.

Collectively, non-performing assets (NPAs) accounted for 15.3% of these lenders’ total microlending portfolio. Although industry-level data until the end of December is not yet available, quarterly results indicated that the overall sectoral asset quality is probably going to deteriorate.

Concentration Issues remain persistent
Concentration issues affect small financing banks in two ways. First, a lot of people are heavily exposed to the microfinance industry, which has been experiencing a lot of stress. Second, a small number of these banks are highly exposed to areas of greater stress.

According to the CEOs of major firms, these problems might be resolved by combining these banks or by merging with larger organizations that have substantial financial resources. Further, as per a prominent microfinance practitioner, it might make sense for banks that operate in different regions to merge since it would mitigate the concentration risk.

A Standing External Advisory Committee (SEAC) was previously established by the RBI to review applications for Small Finance Banks (SFBs) and Universal Banks. The Reserve Bank of India’s Department of Regulation would provide the committee with secretarial support, the RBI had stated in a release.

Category Risks
Coming to category risks, for example, ESAF Small Finance Bank’s native state of Kerala and its neighboring state of Tamil Nadu account for 57% of its gross advances, with unsecured loans accounting for 56% of the total. In a similar vein, Utkarsh Small Finance Bank has 916 banking locations spread over five states: Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Maharashtra. Of these, two-thirds of total loans fall into the category of unsecured microfinance.

That area is the primary focus of the Northeast Small Finance Bank, which combined with the fintech startup Slice, based in Bengaluru.

The majority of SFBs reported yearly increase in deposit mobilization that was higher than the average for the banking sector. Despite starting from a low foundation of Rs 6,484 crore a year ago, Suryoday leads the field with a 49.7% year-over-year rise to Rs 9,708 crore at the end of December.

In the third quarter, the bank’s gross non-performing assets (NPAs) increased to 5.5% of its total advances of Rs 9,563 crore. While lending increased 16% to Rs 19,057 crore, Utkarsh recorded a 33.5% year-over-year increase in deposits to Rs 20,172 crore.

The SFB ecosystem was established by the RBI to improve loan availability to micro and small businesses as well as the agricultural industry.

The image added is for representation purposes only

Renewable Energy Sector Awaits Budget 2025 for Key Support Measures

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

SFBs to face high NPAs and slow credit growth in the financial year 2025

SFBs to face high NPAs and slow credit growth in the financial year 2025

The Small Finance Banks (SFBs) in India are expected to see an increase in Non-performing Assets in the financial year 2025, as per the information given by ICRA, a credit rating agency. The rating agency further stated that the asset (credit) growth will observe a weak growth. This weakening growth is expected to be around 18 to 20 percent compared to the 24 percent growth in the financial year 2025. Previously, it has experienced a thriving growth in the last two financial years.

Increase in Gross NPAs ratio
The Small finance banks’ gross non-performing assets ratio surged to 2.8 in the month of September compared to the previous ratio of 0.5 percent. The reason for this increasing indebtedness is problems in the microfinance sector. It has affected the asset quality of the SFBs badly. ICRA underlines that these SFBs will face issues while maintaining their asset (loan) quality.

The microfinance sector in India is facing a number of challenges such as increase in overdue loans, operational challenges, and regulatory issues. Most of the small finance banks are active in the microfinance segment only. The growing concerns in the microfinance segment is also considered as the reason for the slow growth in credit creation in the small finance banks.

Diversification of asset class
For many years, the small finance banks segment has been working on diversifying their various services offerings. Currently, these products consist of many retail asset (loan) types such as business loans, gold loans, and loans against property. housing loans, and auto loans. This increase in the secured asset class has led to a fall in share of unsecured loans in the total asset class of these banks.

ICRA’s head for the financial sector rating, Manushree Saggar stated that the matter of concern in the microfinance industry indicates that the possible growth drivers in the financial year 2026 will be secured asset classes as many SFBs are moving towards diversification of portfolios. The SFBs are taking measures towards reducing their dependency on unsecured asset classes.

Issues with CASA
A significant proportion of current and savings account deposits (CASA) in banks is important in terms of banks’ financial health as well as its ability to generate credit availability. Currently, the share of CASA of the small finance banks recorded 28 percent of growth by the month of September, 2024. Despite this, the growth in CASAs of SFBs is considerably smaller compared to the CASA proportion of universal banks.

The small finance banks in India face the issue of increasing the share of low-cost CASA. In the month of September 2024, the credit-deposit ratio of SFBs fell to around 89 percent compared to the credit-deposit ratio of 97 percent in the month of March 2023. This challenge is expected to carry on in the upcoming term as well.

The rating agency also anticipates that the small finance banks will face the issue of increasing competition in deposit levels. This will lead to a shift of small finance banks in the direction of term deposits, which have high interest rates. This shift will lead to a hike in funding expenses.

Other issues of SFBs
The small finance banks are suffering from the issue of rising operating expenses. The reasons for higher operational cost is expansion of branches, increase in staff costs, and also the increasing measures taken for tackling the NPA debtors. These issues are largely leading to hikes in operations expenses of these banks.

Adverse impact on Profitability
The hike in asset cost is anticipated to slow down the total profitability ratio of the small finance banks in the financial year 2025. At the industry level, the ratio of return on assets is expected to fall at a range of 1.4 percent to 1.6 percent in the financial year 2025 compared to the return on asset ratio of 2.1 percent in the financial year 2024. Overall, these challenges will impact the margins of small finance banks adversely.

The future prospects for the small finance banks highlights an adjustment period. It has to go through these challenges of credit creation, high NPA, and operational costs. At the same time, the SFBs has to find better growth opportunities through the process of increasing the proportion of secured assets and also diversification of its portfolio.

The image added is for representation purposes only

India plans to divestment of 5 public sector banks

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

Jana SFB Q2FY25: Secured Growth Drives Advances, Profit Declines Amid MFI Stress

Jana SFB Q2FY25: Secured Growth Drives Advances, Profit Declines Amid MFI Stress

Company Name: Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd | NSE Code: JSFB| BSE Code: 544118 | 52 Week high/low: 761 / 365 | CMP: INR 510 | Mcap: INR 5,352 Cr | P/BV – 1.49

About the stock
➡️Jana SFB is leading small finance bank engaged in providing MSME loan, affordable housing loan, 2W loan, gold loan, Micro LAP etc. Jana SFB has rapidly expanded network with 776 banking outlet including 261 outlet in unbanked rural centres, in 22 states/ 2UTs while serving 4.5 Mn active customers.

Robust Advance growth thanks to secured book; Disbursement slowdown
➡️Jana’s total advance book grew 17.3% YoY (+2.5% QoQ) to 26,411 Cr thanks to the secured book. Secured book at 65% of the Jana total book report a growth of 28.6% YoY (+7.4% QoQ) to 17,063 Cr while Unsecured book moderate at 1% YoY and de-growth 5.4% QoQ to 9,348 Cr. Secured book contribution jump from 56% in Q2FY24 to 65% in Q2FY25 and management further planning to increased its weight in overall book.
➡️Healthy growth of secured book attributed to affordable housing (up 43.3% YoY) and Micro LAP (up 24.2% YoY) segment. This both combines cross the milestone of 10,000 Cr. 2W and gold loan also report a sound growth of 95% and 80% YoY but have low weightage in overall book. MSME and term loans to NBFCs grew 16.5% YoY and 3% YoY respectively.
➡️Disbursement growth modest at 0.3% YoY and 3.3% QoQ to 8,457 Cr due to MFI challenges.
➡️Deposit growth higher than advance growth at 31% YoY to 24,808 Cr while CASA as % of total deposit remains flat.

Book Growth (As on)  Q2FY25 Q2FY24 YoY (%) Q1FY25 QoQ (%)
Advance  26,411 21,842 17.30% 25,751 2.50%
Secured  17,063 12,183 28.60% 15,800 7.40%
Unsecured 9,348 9,255 1.00% 9,853 -5.40%
Disbursement  8,457 8,432 0.30% 8,178 3.30%
Deposit 24,808 17,118 31% 23,667 4.60%

NII Soar on solid advance growth while NIMs contract
➡️Interest income grew 19% YoY and remain flat on QoQ to 1,166 Cr led by solid secured book growth while yield down 30 bps YoY (-90 bps QoQ) to 17.2%. NII grew 13% YoY to 594 Cr with support of advance growth while CoF expand and NIMs decline. On QoQ NII down 3% led to modest growth of book on QoQ and NIMs contraction. PPOP report 6% YoY while decline 16 QoQ to 299 Cr due to lower other income. PAT down 21% YoY and sequentially 43% to 97 Cr led by higher provision growth.

All figures are in Cr 

Years  Q2FY25 Q2FY24 YoY (%) Q1FY25 QoQ (%) Commentry
Interest income  1,166 979 19% 1,167 0%
Interest expenses 572 453 26% 557 3%
NII 594 526 13% 610 -3% Healthy advance lead growth, NIMs contract
Other income  176 164 7% 189 -7%
Total Net income 770 690 12% 799 -4%
Employee expenses 296 239 24% 278 6%
Other OpEx 175 168 4% 165 6%
Total Opex  471 407 16% 443 6%
PPOP 299 283 6% 356 -16% QoQ decline due to 30 bps decline in NIMs
Provision 210 160 31% 196 7%
PBT 89 123 -28% 160 -44%
Tax expenses  -8 0 -10 -20%
Tax rate  -9% 0% -6% 44%
PAT  97 123 -21% 170 -43% Higher provision degrowth PAT 
PAT% 7% 11% -33% 13% -42%
EPS 9.28 16.73 -45% 16.27 -43%
No. of equity shares  10.45 7.35 42% 10.45 0%

Asset quality tempered on stress in MFI segment
➡️Jana asset quality has been decline due to the stress in the MFI segment. GNPA/NNPA jump 55 bps/13 bps YoY and 35 bps/remain flat QoQ to 2.86%/0.95%. Net NPA has 82% secured loan which signifies higher chances of recovery. Company has already done strong PCR for all business, PCR up 230 bps YoY (+450 bps QoQ) to 67.2%.

Asset Quality Q2FY25 Q2FY24 YoY (bps) Q1FY25 QoQ (bps)
GNPA 2.86 2.31 55 2.51 35
NNPA 0.95 0.82 13 0.95 0

Valuation and key metrics
➡️Currently the stock is trading at multiple of 1.49 price to book value and book value per share stood at 342 Rs. Yield decline 30 bps YoY (-90 bps QoQ) to 17.2% while CoF jump 60 bps YoY and remain flat on QoQ to 8%. Yield contraction is led by competitive environment and challenges in MFI segment while CoF expansion driven by increase in deposit rate for attracting retail deposit. This result in decline in NiMs by 20 bps YoY and 30 bps QoQ to 7.7%. Return ratio disappoint as ROE and ROA down by 500 bps and 40 bps YoY. Company’s capital position remain solid with 20.1% Capital adequacy ratio.

Key metrics  Q2FY25 Q2FY24 bps Q1FY25 bps
Yield 17.2 17.5 -30 18.1 -90
CoF 8 7.4 60 8 0
NIMs 7.7 7.9 -20 8 -30
Credit Cost 1.86 2.33 -47 186
ROA 1.2 1.6 -40 2.1 -90
ROE 14.5 19.5 -500 18.8 -430
PCR 67.2 64.9 230 62.7 450
CAR 18.8 17.5 130 19.3 -50
CASA 20.1 20.5 -40 20.4 -30

Management Guidance for FY25.
➡️Management expect overall 20% growth in AUM and deposit in FY25.
➡️PAT growth of 30%-40% in FY25 will led by advance and disbursal growth.
➡️ROA and ROE maintained at 1.8% -2% and 19%-21% respectively. Company will continue to increase the secured business led to decline in NIMs.

The image added is for representation purposes only

TCS Unveils Pace Studio in Philippines to Boost Digital Innovation

Microfinance sector recorded surge in NPAs to Rs. 50000 crore

Navigating Challenges Small Finance Banks Brace for 26% Slower Credit Growth

Navigating Challenges Small Finance Banks Brace for 26% Slower Credit Growth

By offering fundamental banking services to people with restricted access to traditional banking institutions, Small Finance Banks were founded to promote financial inclusion. SFBs were established with the primary goal of providing services to underbanked and unbanked segments of the population as well as micro, small, and medium-sized companies (MSMEs). Usually designed to satisfy the specific requirements of their customer base, their product offerings include of savings accounts, microloans, and small loans.

Small Finance Banks (SFBs) in India have experienced significant growth in recent years, emerging as key players in the financial sector by catering to the underserved segments of the population. However, the robust expansion that has characterized the sector is expected to decelerate this fiscal year, with credit growth projected to slow down to approximately 26%. This expected slowdown is indicative of both the evolving dynamics within the financial sector and the broader economic landscape of India.

Several factors are contributing to the anticipated slowdown in credit growth for SFBs this fiscal year. These factors include regulatory changes, increased competition, and macroeconomic uncertainties that are affecting the financial services industry as a whole.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has implemented stringent regulatory norms for SFBs, aimed at ensuring financial stability and protecting depositors’ interests. These regulations require SFBs to maintain higher capital adequacy ratios and adhere to stricter lending guidelines, which can limit their ability to extend credit. The increased compliance costs associated with these regulations also affect the profitability of SFBs, leading to a more cautious approach in credit disbursement.

As the Indian economy continues to grow, traditional banks and NBFCs are increasingly entering the market segments that SFBs have historically dominated. These larger financial institutions often have better resources and more extensive networks, allowing them to offer competitive rates and services that can attract customers away from SFBs. This heightened competition forces SFBs to rethink their strategies and could lead to a more conservative lending approach.

Additionally, inflationary pressures can affect the repayment capacity of borrowers, especially those in the lower-income segments, leading to a potential rise in non-performing assets (NPAs) for SFBs. To mitigate this risk, SFBs may adopt a more prudent lending approach, contributing to the slowdown in credit growth.

Over the past few years, some SFBs have experienced an increase in NPAs due to the challenging economic conditions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors. In response, many SFBs are focusing on strengthening their balance sheets by improving asset quality and reducing NPAs. This shift in focus may result in a more conservative lending strategy, with banks prioritizing risk management over rapid expansion.

Despite the expected slowdown in credit growth, the outlook for SFBs remains positive in the long term. The slowdown provides an opportunity for these banks to consolidate their operations, improve risk management practices, and focus on sustainable growth. Several strategies could help SFBs navigate the current challenges and continue to play a vital role in promoting financial inclusion.

One of the key strategies for SFBs to maintain growth is by leveraging technology and digital platforms to enhance their service offerings. By adopting digital banking solutions, SFBs can reduce operational costs, improve customer experience, and reach a broader audience. The use of data analytics and artificial intelligence can also help in assessing credit risk more accurately, enabling SFBs to make more informed lending decisions.

Collaborating with fintech companies, NBFCs, and other financial institutions can provide SFBs with access to new technologies, markets, and customer segments. Strategic partnerships can also help SFBs enhance their product offerings and improve operational efficiencies, contributing to sustainable growth.

In Conclusion, While the projected slowdown in credit growth may seem concerning, it also presents an opportunity for Small Finance Banks to reassess their strategies and focus on sustainable growth. By leveraging technology, diversifying products, strengthening risk management practices, and building strategic partnerships, SFBs can continue to thrive and play a crucial role in promoting financial inclusion in India. The evolving landscape will require SFBs to adapt and innovate, ensuring that they remain competitive and resilient in the face of new challenges.

The image added is for representation purposes only

Sugar Industry Fears New Norms May Stifle Growth and Innovation