Menu

RBI

Rupee Surge and the RBI Hold: What It Means for Indian Investors
Banking, Currency, Economy, Markets - October 6, 2025

Rupee Surge and the RBI Hold: What It Means for Indian Investors

Rupee Surge and the RBI Hold: What It Means for Indian Investors

On October 1, 2025 the Reserve Bank of India’s Monetary Policy Committee kept the policy repo rate unchanged at 5.50% and retained a neutral stance, while revising its real GDP forecast for fiscal 2025–26 upwards to 6.8% and trimming inflation projections. The decision was framed as a “dovish pause” that balanced upside growth revisions against still-benign inflation signals. The same day, the Indian rupee delivered its strongest simple daily gain in two weeks, closing around ₹88.69 per USD, as the U.S. dollar weakened amid geopolitical and US-political uncertainty. Indian equity indices also responded positively, with the BSE Sensex and Nifty 50 up roughly 0.9% on the day.

Why the RBI hold matters for markets
A central bank decision to pause (rather than hike) does more than freeze borrowing costs — it signals the path of future policy and affects risk appetite. By holding at 5.50% while revising growth upwards, the RBI has telegraphed that inflation is under enough control to allow a lenient stance if growth needs support. For investors this means:
* Equities: A neutral stance plus stronger growth forecasts typically supports higher earnings expectations for cyclical sectors (private consumption, banking, capital goods). The immediate market reaction — a near 1% rise in headline indices — reflects this linkage.
* Fixed income: Hints of future easing can pressure bond yields lower over time, but in the short run yields rose: India’s 10-year G-sec yield moved to the mid 6.5% area (around 6.52–6.59% on Oct 1), reflecting recent supply and global yield dynamics. That rise suggests spillovers from global rates and near-term liquidity rather than domestic policy surprise alone.
* FX: The rupee’s modest bounce was aided more by a softer U.S. dollar and potential RBI intervention than by a structural reversal. The central bank’s willingness to stabilise FX via state-bank dollar sales (if necessary) remains important given India’s open-economy exposures.

The rupee move — temporary reprieve or trend change?
The rupee’s ₹88.69 close on October 1 marked a technical recovery after a run of losses, but several factors argue caution before calling a structural reversal. First, India’s trade balance and dollar demand from importers and oil bills remain material; second, global dollar strength and yields set the backdrop for capital flows. ANZ and other banks flagged that a gradual depreciation remains a reasonable baseline absent large positive external shocks. Therefore, investors should treat the October 1 rally as a stabilising move, not definitive appreciation.

Sector and portfolio implications — practical takeaways
* Banks and financials: A neutral RBI stance plus growth upgrades typically favour loan growth and credit demand. Banking stocks often lead short-term rallies, but watch net interest margin (NIM) sensitivity to future rate cuts. If the RBI moves to ease later, NIM compression is a medium-term risk; however, higher loan volumes may offset some margin pressure.
* Exporters & IT services: Exporters benefit from a stable or weaker rupee. A sharper rupee depreciation supports reported rupee revenue for US-dollar earners; conversely, a strengthening rupee can compress margins. Given the RBI’s interventions and global dollar drivers, exporters should hedge near-term FX exposures selectively.
* Defensive consumer and domestic plays: Stronger growth forecasts support consumption themes—FMCG, retail and autos—but margin pressure from input inflation remains the watchpoint.
* Fixed income investors: With 10-year yields near 6.5–6.6%, investors must weigh duration risk versus yield pick-up. Shorter-dated government papers and dynamic bond funds offer ways to capture yields if the market expects eventual easing. Institutional investors should watch primary G-Sec supply calendars and CCIL indicative yields for yield curve shifts.

Risks and what to monitor next
Investors should track: RBI forward guidance — any explicit timing for cuts; inflation prints month-by-month to confirm the 2.6%/lower inflation trajectory the RBI signalled; external flows (FPI flows) and the US dollar index (which was ~97.6 on Oct 1) because global liquidity will dominate FX moves; and 10-year G-sec yields which set borrowing cost expectations for corporates. Market participants should prepare for volatility around US macro and political developments that have outsized short-term FX and rate implications.

Conclusion
The RBI’s October 1, 2025 hold with an upward GDP tweak provides a constructive backdrop for growth-oriented allocations in India, but the rupee’s bounce looks tactical rather than decisive. Prudent investors should overweight cyclicals and credit plays that benefit from growth if valuations permit; hedge significant FX exposure in export/import business models; and manage duration in fixed income, balancing attractive mid-6% yields against potential policy and supply shocks. The central bank bought markets a moment of clarity; the coming weeks of data and global sentiment will determine whether that clarity becomes a durable trend.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Activist Investors on Overdrive: The 2025 Surge in Corporate Campaigns

, , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
How India’s Fiscal & Monetary Settings Are Shaping Investment Flows
Banking, Economy, Markets - October 3, 2025

How India’s Fiscal & Monetary Settings Are Shaping Investment Flows

How India’s Fiscal & Monetary Settings Are Shaping Investment Flows

On October 1, 2025 the Reserve Bank of India’s Monetary Policy Committee left the repo rate unchanged at 5.50% and described stance as neutral, while upgrading its FY26 GDP forecast to 6.8%. The policy note emphasised “policy space” to support growth if needed. On the fiscal side, the Union Budget 2025–26 set a fiscal-deficit target of 4.4% of GDP (budget estimate) after a Revised Estimate of 4.8% for FY24–25 — reflecting gradual fiscal consolidation ambitions. These headline numbers (repo 5.50%; GDP 6.8%; fiscal deficit 4.4–4.8% of GDP) are the starting point for investor reactions.

Direct transmission to bond markets and yields
Monetary calm — a pause or eventual easing — lowers the expected terminal rate and thus puts downward pressure on sovereign yields, all else equal. India’s 10-year G-sec yield traded around ~6.52% on October 1, 2025, after a brief oscillation driven by supply and global rate moves. Lower domestic policy rates or an explicit easing cycle typically compress short-end yields first; longer maturities respond to expectations for growth, inflation and fiscal financing needs. Because India’s fiscal path still implies sizeable market borrowing (net market borrowings remain a multi-lakh-crore exercise each year), the supply-side of debt can offset some rate easing, keeping the curve steeper than peers. Investors therefore watch the 10-year yield as the principal fulcrum for duration allocation.

Effects on equities — valuation and sectoral tilt
A neutral-to-dovish RBI alongside an upward GDP revision lifts the earnings-growth narrative: cyclical sectors (banks, consumer discretionary, capital goods) benefit from higher projected loan growth and consumption. Equity markets priced this in on Oct 1 with domestic indices rallying on the policy decision and bank-stock strength. But two caveats matter for equity investors: sustained outperformance requires earnings visibility — not just rate psychology — and foreign portfolio investor (FPI) activity can swamp domestic flows in the short term. Valuation multiples (P/E and EV/EBITDA) expand when real yields fall; hence, any durable multiple expansion depends on a credible path to lower real rates without fiscal slippage.

FPI flows: sensitivity to yield differentials and risk
Foreign investors trade across fixed income and equities based on relative reward-adjusted carry and near-term political or macro risk. September 2025 saw net FPI selling in equities (reports show continued net sales in September, though at a slower pace), driven by global risk-off and U.S. policy uncertainty. When India’s real yields are attractive — and global risk-on returns — FPIs buy; when global liquidity tightens or political/frictional risks rise, they exit. Hence the RBI’s communication (clarity on rate path) and the fiscal arithmetic (smaller-than-expected deficits) are both key to stabilising FPI flows. A credible glide-path on deficit reduction can reduce risk premia and entice long-duration foreign buyers of G-secs.

FX and the rupee: two-way pressure
Monetary policy and fiscal strategy combine to determine the rupee’s vulnerability to shocks. A dovish RBI may reduce carry attractiveness relative to the U.S., favouring rupee depreciation; but if dovishness is accompanied by stronger growth and narrowing fiscal deficits, that can offset depreciation pressures through improved capital inflows. On Oct 1, 2025 the rupee staged a technical rebound (closing near ₹88.69/USD) after the RBI pause and dollar softness, yet analysts still warn of gradual depreciation absent a durable improvement in the external current account or steady FPI inflows. In short, FX moves are the net outcome of yield differentials, external balances (oil/imports), and capital flow swings.

Interaction of fiscal policy with investor confidence
Fiscal consolidation commitments — moving fiscal deficit from 4.8% (RE 2024–25) toward 4.4% (BE 2025–26) — matter because investors price sovereign risk via both expected supply and macro credibility. A clear, multi-year plan to reduce deficits without choking growth reduces term premia and encourages long-term foreign holdings of government bonds and listed corporate paper. Conversely, fiscal slippage or unanticipated off-budget liabilities would raise required yields and depress both bond and equity valuations. Transparent issuance calendars and predictable bond supply are therefore as important as headline deficit numbers for market functioning.

Practical takeaways for investors
* Fixed income investors should monitor the 10-year G-sec (≈6.5% range) and RBI guidance; favour short-to-intermediate duration if supply risks persist.
* Equity investors can tactically overweight cyclical sectors if growth revisions sustain; manage risk from potential FPI outflows and currency moves.
* Foreign investors will track fiscal consolidation credibility and real-yield differentials versus the U.S./EM peers before committing longer-duration capital.

Conclusion
India’s current policy mix — an RBI pause at 5.50%, an upgraded growth outlook (6.8%) and a fiscal-deficit glide-path toward ~4.4% — creates a constructive but nuanced backdrop for capital flows. Lower-for-longer policy expectations support equities and lower short-end yields, while fiscal credibility and global risk appetite will determine whether foreign investors return in meaningful size to bonds and stocks. For market participants, the interplay of central-bank signalling, budget execution, and external-flow dynamics will dictate asset allocation decisions in the quarters ahead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

India’s year-end IPO blitz: risks, rewards and what to watch

, , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
RBI raises loans-against-shares limit fivefold: will it meaningfully deepen market liquidity?
Banking, Economy, Markets - October 1, 2025

RBI raises loans-against-shares limit fivefold: will it meaningfully deepen market liquidity?

RBI raises loans-against-shares limit fivefold: will it meaningfully deepen market liquidity?

On October 1, 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced a set of measures to ease capital-market related lending: the ceiling on loans against shares for individuals has been increased from ₹20 lakh to ₹1 crore, and the IPO financing limit per investor has been raised from ₹10 lakh to ₹25 lakh. The governor flagged these as part of broader steps to improve credit flow and deepen market participation.

The mechanics — what these limits mean in practice
“Loan against shares” refers to loans banks or NBFCs extend to borrowers who pledge listed equity as collateral. Historically, regulatory ceilings (like ₹20 lakh) constrained the simple retail and HNI use of equity as a liquidity source. Raising the ceiling to ₹1 crore expands the notional collateral value an individual can mobilise, subject to the lender’s internal margin (loan-to-value, or LTV) rules and credit appraisal. Separately, the higher IPO financing cap (now ₹25 lakh) permits investors to borrow more to subscribe to primary offerings — a direct boost to IPO subscription capacity.

Immediate market and product implications
Banks and retail lenders are likely to respond in two ways: offer larger secured lines against listed portfolios to affluent retail and HNI clients, and relaunch or expand IPO-funding products aimed at active retail investors. This could raise short-term demand for allocations in large upcoming IPOs — for example, the scheduled Tata Capital offering (₹15,511 crore) and other year-end deals — by increasing the pool of financed bids.

Liquidity vs. leverage — the risk trade-off
Easier access to cash via pledged equities increases liquidity for households and corporates, but it also raises systemic leverage and margin-call vulnerability. If lenders set high LTVs (say 50–70% for highly liquid large-cap stocks), a ₹1 crore permissible loan could imply a portfolio value of ₹1.4–2 crore pledged. In falling markets, forced liquidations or margin calls can accelerate selloffs — a classical procyclical effect. The RBI’s move removes a regulatory cap but does not automatically change prudent underwriting: banks still control LTVs, haircuts and concentration limits.

Potential winners and losers
Winners: retail brokers, margin-finance desks, NBFCs and private banks that can scale collateralised lending products; IPO issuers that may see stronger subscription momentum; and large-cap liquid stocks (which make more attractive collateral). Losers/ Risks: highly leveraged retail investors using small-cap holdings as collateral face amplified downside; volatile small-caps might see short-term selling pressure if lenders apply strict haircuts. Sectoral beneficiaries will likely include wealth tech platforms that package IPO financing and banks with dedicated prime-broker desks.

Macro and monetary context
The announcement coincided with the RBI’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) communication in which the policy repo rate was left unchanged (reported at 5.5% in some real-time coverage), indicating the central bank’s aim to balance monetary normalcy with targeted structural liquidity measures. By enabling more market-linked lending without broad rate easing, the RBI appears to be nudging credit allocation toward capital-market activity while maintaining overall price and financial stability vigilance.

Regulatory safeguards and open questions
The RBI has also proposed removing regulatory ceilings on lending against listed debt securities — another liberalising step — but the detailed supervisory safeguards (uniform LTV caps, concentration limits across banks, stress testing of pledged collateral) will matter for outcomes. Key open questions: Will lenders broadly adopt high LTVs or remain conservative? How quickly will IPO-financing products scale? And what contingency plans exist for abrupt market corrections triggered by margin calls? The answers will shape whether this becomes a sustainable liquidity expansion or a source of cyclical vulnerability.

Investor takeaway
Retail and HNI investors should treat the higher limits as an opportunity, not an unconditional green light. If considering borrowing against shares or using IPO financing, investors should: check lender LTVs and margin-call terms, avoid pledging concentrated small-cap positions, stress-test portfolios for 20–30% market declines, and use financing selectively for high-conviction, liquid exposures. Financial advisers should re-run scenario analyses (VaR / stress tests) before recommending leveraged solutions.

Conclusion
RBI’s decision on October 1, 2025 to raise the lending caps against equities to ₹1 crore and lift IPO financing to ₹25 lakh is a clear attempt to deepen capital-market intermediation and ease short-term funding frictions. It promises greater market liquidity and new product flows, but also reinstates an age-old trade-off between liquidity and leverage. The net effect will depend on how prudently banks price risk and how retail participants manage leverage in a potentially volatile market environment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

LG Electronics’ India unit IPO: valuation, strategy and sector implications

, , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
Can India’s Private Sector Growth Sustain Itself Amid Cooling Momentum?
Economy, Market News, Markets - September 30, 2025

Can India’s Private Sector Growth Sustain Itself Amid Cooling Momentum?

Can India’s Private Sector Growth Sustain Itself Amid Cooling Momentum?

India’s private sector entered the autumn of 2025 on a high—then showed signs of moderation. Flash PMI data released in late September recorded a slowdown from August’s multi-year highs: the S&P Global/HSBC composite PMI slipped to 61.9 in September from 63.2 in August, with manufacturing at 58.5 and services at 61.6. While these readings still indicate robust expansion, the moderation is meaningful because it follows exceptionally strong momentum earlier in the summer and coincides with increased external headwinds.

Where the cooling shows up: sectors and indicators
The moderation is broad-based rather than concentrated. Manufacturing’s PMI fell from its more euphoric August print—after a run that saw factory growth hit a 17-year high—suggesting a normalization in new orders and production. Services, though still expanding strongly, recorded slower demand growth and a softening in job creation. Survey respondents cited weaker international orders and heightened competition as key constraints, which dented confidence among exporters and service providers that rely on cross-border demand. Employment gains weakened; firms reported smaller increases in hiring compared with August, which is notable for an economy that depends on sustained private-sector job creation to translate growth into inclusive outcomes.

Macro context: strong growth, but rising external vulnerabilities
At the macro level, India’s headline growth remains solid. Official projections and government releases pointed to a strong start to FY 2025–26, with real GDP expanding by 7.8% in Q1 (released August 30, 2025) compared with a year earlier—evidence that the domestic economy retains considerable underlying strength. Yet this vigor exists alongside mounting external pressures. Portfolio flows turned negative in recent weeks: foreign investors had net sold about $1.3 billion of Indian equities through September 25, 2025, and August saw sizeable FPI outflows from Indian financials (roughly ₹232.9 billion, or about $2.7 billion sold from financial stocks in August). The rupee also tested weaker levels, prompting occasional market intervention. These capital-flow dynamics can blunt private-sector momentum by tightening local financial conditions and raising funding costs for corporates.

Which segments are weakening — and which are holding up
Export-oriented manufacturing and some business services have shown the earliest signs of strain because of softer overseas demand and new tariff frictions affecting global trade. Sectors with larger export exposure reported weaker new orders and tougher pricing environments. By contrast, domestic-facing sectors—construction, FMCG, certain parts of retail and organised consumption—continue to benefit from festival-season demand and easing domestic inflation trends. Financials and infrastructure-linked industries are mixed: credit demand is improving in pockets, but foreign selling and investor caution have amplified volatility in financial stocks. Overall, the pattern is one of decelerating export momentum while domestic demand remains a key plank sustaining activity.

Policy levers: what authorities can and are likely to do
Policymakers have tools to shore up private-sector momentum. The Reserve Bank of India’s immediate stance—markets expected the RBI to hold the repo at 5.50% at its early-October meeting, though a surprise cut was discussed by some economists—reflects a willingness to be data-driven and respond if growth weakens or global conditions warrant easing. Targeted liquidity support, calibrated cuts to policy rates, or regulatory nudges to ease credit to MSMEs and exporters are plausible near-term measures to sustain growth without stoking inflation. On the fiscal side, the government can deploy demand support via capex acceleration, sector-specific relief for export-linked industries, and tax measures timed around festive consumption to keep domestic demand buoyant. The effectiveness of these levers will depend on timely calibration and the persistence of external shocks.

Investor signals to watch
For investors and market observers, five indicators will be especially informative in judging sustainability:
* Final PMI releases (early October 2025) — confirmation that the flash PMI’s moderation is a temporary wobble or a deeper softening.
* Monthly FPI flow data — continued net outflows would tighten financial conditions and raise risk premia for private corporates.
* Rupee movement and central bank intervention — sharp depreciation can raise imported input costs and squeeze margins.
* Corporate earnings guidance for Q2 2025–26 — early warning if demand softening is translating quickly into revenue/ margin pressure.
* Credit off-take and bank lending rates — signs that credit availability is loosening or tightening materially, particularly for MSMEs and capex loans.

Practical implications and conclusion
India’s private sector is not collapsing — the economy had a strong Q1 and PMI readings remain expansionary — but growth is entering a more precarious phase where external shocks (trade policy, global demand) and capital outflows can quickly alter the path. A constructive baseline sees domestic demand, policy support and fiscal capex keeping growth robust; a downside scenario would combine weaker exports, persistent foreign outflows and policy passivity, which could tip the economy into a wider slowdown.
For investors and corporate decision-makers, the prudent course is to monitor the five signals above, prioritize balance-sheet resilience, and avoid over-exposure to highly export-dependent niches until clarity on global demand and capital flows returns. Policymakers can help by deploying targeted, timely measures to support credit and demand without undermining inflation anchors. The private sector’s ability to sustain growth will be tested in the coming months — and the balance between domestic engines and external shocks will determine whether the current expansion evolves into a durable upswing or a temporary burst.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Biggest Gainers from the Upcoming Nifty Rebalancing

, , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
Why Indian Markets Bounced After a 7-Session Losing Streak
Banking, Economy, Markets - September 30, 2025

Why Indian Markets Bounced After a 7-Session Losing Streak

Why Indian Markets Bounced After a 7-Session Losing Streak

On Tuesday, September 30, 2025, Indian equity benchmarks staged a modest recovery after a seven-session slide. The Nifty 50 rose to 24,677.9 and the BSE Sensex moved to 80,469.39 in early trade — a small rebound that stopped a run of losses and reflected sector-specific buying rather than a broad risk-on shift.

What triggered the rebound: banks and metals
Two visible threads explain the recovery. First, financials — particularly public sector banks — led buying as market participants priced in regulatory changes that make credit more flexible and encourage lending. Public sector bank indices rose noticeably, reflecting expectations of easing credit conditions and better capital access for lenders. Second, metal stocks rallied on a softer U.S. dollar and commodity dynamics that improve dollar-priced commodity returns for rupee investors, boosting the metal index by around 1% on the day. Together these pockets of strength produced enough index weight to nudge the benchmarks higher.

The RBI’s role: targeted easing, not looser supervision
A critical proximate driver was a set of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circulars published around September 30 that relax specific lending rules while strengthening oversight in other areas. The changes allow banks to revise some components of small-business loan spreads more frequently, let borrowers switch to fixed-rate loans at reset, and broaden permissible working-capital lending against gold for businesses that use gold as raw material. The package is explicitly designed to improve credit flow to MSMEs and gold-intensive industries without compromising supervisory oversight. Markets interpreted those moves as supportive for lenders’ core business — hence the banking sector rally.

How big is the market move, really?
The moves were modest: Nifty’s intraday gain was about 0.18% and Sensex added roughly 0.14% in early trade — enough to halt the slide but not to signal a sustained reversal of the recent downtrend. The rebound followed a painful stretch during which Indian indices fell over multiple sessions and experienced their sharpest weekly drops in almost seven months, reflecting a mix of domestic and global headwinds.

The sombre backdrop: foreign investor outflows and macro risks
Despite the knee-jerk rebound, the underlying story remains fragile. Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have been net sellers in recent weeks and months; data through September shows FPI withdrawals of about ₹7,945 crore in the month, contributing to cumulative net outflows for the year that run into tens of thousands of crores. On some measures, foreign selling in financials and other cyclical segments has been pronounced, and international hedge funds have registered sizeable short-term selloffs in emerging-market Asia — a reminder that domestic relief measures have to work against broader global risk aversion. These flows can blunt or reverse any domestic policy-driven bounce.

What investors should watch now
* RBI communications and MPC outcome (early October): The market is parsing not just the technical circulars but the Monetary Policy Committee messaging. Any signal that the RBI will prioritise growth via liquidity or forbearance could sustain the financials rally; hawkish language would do the opposite.
* FPI flows and dollar/ rupee moves: Continued net foreign outflows or a stronger dollar would keep downward pressure on risk assets and on the rupee, offsetting domestic positives.
* Earnings and valuation checks: Gains concentrated in weighed sectors (banks, metals) can make headline indices look healthier while individual stocks — especially in mid and small caps — remain vulnerable if earnings don’t meet expectations.

Tactical and strategic takeaways
For short-term traders, the rebound offers intraday and swing opportunities in beaten-up bank and metal names, but positions must be protected with tight stops because macro flows can re-assert quickly. For long-term investors, the RBI moves are constructive for credit availability and MSME financing, but they do not negate systemic risks posed by persistent foreign selling and external shocks. A balanced approach — trimming into strength, adding selectively to high-quality franchises with healthy balance sheets, and keeping an allocation to macro hedges (cash/gold or defensive sectors) — is prudent.

Conclusion
The September 30 bounce was real but contained: regulatory tweaks by the RBI acted as a catalyst for sectoral buying in banks and metals, yet the market’s longer-term direction remains hostage to global investor flows and macro signals. The rebound bought breathing room, not certainty — investors should treat it as an opportunity to reassess exposures, not as proof that the sell-off is over.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

PhonePe Files for $1.5B IPO at a $15B Valuation: A New Era for India’s Fintech Investing?

, , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
India’s Financial Sector Eyes 11% Credit Growth in FY25 Backed by RBI Reforms and Stronger Balance Sheets
Banking, Economy, Markets - September 20, 2025

India’s Financial Sector Eyes 11% Credit Growth in FY25 Backed by RBI Reforms and Stronger Balance Sheets

India’s Financial Sector Eyes 11% Credit Growth in FY25 Backed by RBI Reforms and Stronger Balance Sheets

India’s banking and financial services industry is entering FY25 with steady momentum. Based on the latest RBI data and sector reports, national bank credit growth has eased to around 11% year-on-year, compared with nearly 16% in FY24. This moderation is partly cyclical, as interest rate transmission, tighter underwriting, and risk-conscious lending weigh on incremental credit. Yet the underlying message is one of resilience: fundamentals are stronger, capital positions are healthier, and policy support remains a tailwind.

Drivers of the Current Growth Path
As of March 2025, the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of public sector banks has declined sharply from 9.11% in March 2021 to 2.58%, indicating a significant improvement in asset quality and a reduction in stressed loans over the past four years. At the same time, the capital-to-risk weighted assets ratio (CRAR) of the banking sector stood at 17.2%, well above the Basel III minimum requirement, showing that banks maintain a strong capital buffer to absorb potential losses and support further credit growth. A key driver of this improved environment is regulatory support. The Reserve Bank of India has recently relaxed Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) requirements, potentially releasing an estimated ₹3 trillion of additional lendable resources into the banking system, which could contribute 1.5–2 percentage points to credit growth in the near term. Simultaneously, the RBI has adjusted risk weights on certain categories of loans, particularly in retail and NBFC exposures, easing capital strain on lenders and allowing for more efficient deployment of funds. Monetary policy also plays a crucial role in shaping credit conditions. After two years of aggressive tightening, the RBI’s stance has shifted to neutral to slightly accommodative. Although the repo rate remains elevated, improving liquidity conditions and softer bond yields provide borrowers with access to relatively cheaper credit. For banks, however, this environment carries the risk of margin compression, as deposit costs—especially on term deposits—remain sticky, potentially narrowing the gap between lending and deposit rates.

Credit Growth Overview
In FY25, overall credit growth in India moderated to approximately 11%, down from 16% in FY24, reflecting a more stabilized lending environment after two years of rapid expansion. During this period, banks extended a total of ₹18.11 trillion in credit, compared with ₹27.56 trillion in the previous fiscal year, indicating a moderation in incremental lending. On the deposit side, total bank deposits increased to ₹20.99 trillion in FY25, slightly lower than ₹27.56 trillion in FY24, suggesting that while deposit mobilization continues, the pace has eased in line with overall credit growth.

Segmental Shifts
In FY25, credit to MSMEs grew by approximately 20%, reaching a total of ₹40 trillion, with public sector banks holding 45.7% of the market share in the micro segment, while private sector banks dominated lending to small and medium-sized enterprises. MSME lending remains the fastest-growing segment, expanding at around 13% year-on-year, supported by government-backed guarantee schemes and a rising demand for working capital. Retail credit continued its upward trajectory, with personal loans comprising about 32% of total credit, largely driven by housing loans. In addition, FinTech NBFCs played a significant role in expanding access to unsecured consumer credit, sanctioning a record 10.9 crore personal loans totaling ₹1,06,548 crore in FY25. In the corporate segment, companies increasingly relied on non-banking financial channels, with nearly half of total funding coming from equity markets, bonds, and NBFC loans rather than traditional bank borrowing. Corporate credit growth has remained modest, around 5–6%, as many companies continue to deleverage or fund projects internally, limiting their demand for new loans. Agricultural credit also expanded steadily, registering growth of 7.3%, with advances reaching ₹23.14 lakh crore, although its pace remains slower compared with retail and MSME segments.
Overall, credit growth across sectors in FY25 presents a varied landscape. MSMEs and retail borrowers are the primary drivers of expansion, reflecting both sustained household demand and strong policy support. In contrast, corporate lending is subdued due to internal financing preferences, while agricultural lending grows steadily but at a moderate pace. Meanwhile, NBFC lending has slowed to roughly 5.7% year-on-year, even as fintech platforms continue rapid growth in unsecured consumer credit; however, this segment faces regulatory scrutiny that could influence near-term trends.

Key Risks to Watch
* Margin pressure is the most pressing. Even if credit demand holds up, banks may struggle to maintain net interest margins if deposit costs remain high. Private banks, in particular, are experiencing slower CASA (current and savings account) growth, forcing them to rely more on costlier term deposits.
* Uneven Demand Landscape: Corporate credit appetite remains weak, and infrastructure lending is sluggish, raising questions about the durability of system-wide growth. Additionally, global risks—such as higher oil prices, trade disruptions, or a stronger U.S. dollar—could tighten external financing conditions and indirectly affect domestic credit supply.
* Unsecured Retail Lending—a fast-growing category—has invited regulatory scrutiny. Any sharp tightening in norms here could dent near-term growth in certain NBFCs and fintechs.

Investor Implications
For investors, the message is to be selective. Banks with strong deposit franchises and diversified loan books are better placed to sustain growth without excessive margin sacrifice. Public sector banks have gained from capital injections and improved asset quality, while private sector lenders remain more efficient in digital adoption and risk assessment. NBFCs focused on niche areas such as vehicle finance, affordable housing, or MSME lending may outperform, but they remain vulnerable to shifts in funding costs. Insurance companies and asset managers, while not direct lenders, benefit indirectly as financial deepening and credit penetration increase savings and investment flows.

Outlook
The financial sector’s ~11% credit growth in FY25 should be seen not as a slowdown but as a stabilization after two years of rapid expansion. With liquidity injections, stronger balance sheets, and regulatory clarity, lenders are positioned for sustainable medium-term growth. The challenge lies in balancing growth with prudence: avoiding a surge in risky assets while maintaining profitability amid shifting rate dynamics. For equity markets, the sector remains central. Financials constitute a significant share of benchmark indices, and their performance often sets the tone for broader market sentiment. While valuations for many banks remain attractive, the real differentiator will be deposit mobilization strength, credit discipline, and digital adaptability.

Conclusion
India’s financial sector is transitioning into a more balanced growth phase. With credit growth stabilizing at ~11%, supported by policy measures, resilient retail and MSME demand, and healthier balance sheets, the outlook remains constructive. Risks exist in the form of margin pressures, uneven corporate demand, and regulatory tightening in pockets, but systemic stability is stronger than in previous cycles. For long-term investors, this phase offers opportunities to back institutions that can compound value by combining prudent growth, efficient funding, and digital-led customer engagement. The next year will likely separate structurally strong lenders from cyclical beneficiaries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Global Equity Funds Face Record $38.66 Billion Outflows Amid Market Valuation Concerns

, , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
How India’s Fiscal & Monetary Settings Are Shaping Investment Flows
Economy, Market News, Markets - September 11, 2025

India’s External Debt Rises 10% in FY25: Structure, Trends, and Key Highlights

India’s External Debt Rises 10% in FY25: Structure, Trends, and Key Highlights

Commercial borrowings and NRI deposits drive the increase, but healthy forex reserves ensure debt sustainability. Despite a sharp rise, India’s external debt position remains manageable, supported by prudent debt structure and strong reserves coverage.

India’s External Debt at a Record $736.3 Billion
At the end of March 2025, India’s external debt stood at $736.3 billion, reflecting a $67.5 billion (10%) increase compared to the previous year. The debt-to-GDP ratio also edged up to 19.1% from 18.5% in FY24, signaling a moderate rise in external obligations relative to economic output.
According to the government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), this debt level remains “modest” in international comparison. India’s foreign exchange reserves cover around 91% of total external debt, offering a substantial buffer against global volatility.

Drivers of the Debt Increase
The sharp rise in FY25 was not uniform but driven by several key factors:
1. Commercial Borrowings
• $41.2 billion increase in commercial borrowings formed the bulk of the rise.
• Companies and financial institutions tapped global credit markets for infrastructure projects, technology upgrades, and business expansion.
• This trend reflects strong investment appetite but also raises exposure to global interest rate cycles.
2. NRI Deposits and Trade Credits
• Deposits from Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) rose by $12.8 billion, signaling continued confidence of the diaspora in India’s growth story.
• Short-term trade credits also expanded as businesses relied on foreign credit to fund imports, adding to the overall debt.
3. Valuation Effects
• The appreciation of the US dollar against other currencies added $5.3 billion to the debt stock purely due to valuation changes.
• Without this factor, the absolute increase would have been even higher.
4. Government Borrowing
• Central and state governments borrowed externally to finance development projects and social programs, aligning with India’s growth and welfare objectives.

Structure of India’s External Debt
Understanding the composition of the debt provides insight into its sustainability.
Long-Term vs Short-Term Debt
• Long-term debt: $601.9 billion (81.7% of total), up $60.6 billion from FY24.
• Short-term debt: $134.4 billion (18.3% of total).
• Short-term debt as a ratio to forex reserves rose slightly to 20.1%, still well within safe limits.
Borrower Profile
• Non-financial corporations: 35.5%
• Deposit-taking institutions (banks, NBFCs): 27.5%
• Central and state governments: 22.9%
• This indicates that corporates and financial firms remain the largest contributors to external liabilities.
Instruments of Debt
• Loans: 34%
• Currency & deposits: 22.8%
• Trade credit & advances: 17.8%
• Debt securities: 17.7%
• Loans remain the dominant source, showing India’s reliance on traditional credit structures rather than volatile securities.
Currency Composition
• US Dollar: 54.2%
• Indian Rupee: 31.1%
• Japanese Yen: 6.2%
• SDRs: 4.6%
• Euro: 3.2%
• The high US dollar share underscores vulnerability to dollar movements, while rising rupee-denominated borrowing helps reduce currency risks.

Year-on-Year Trends
The data highlights several significant shifts compared to FY24:
• Commercial borrowings rose by $41.2 billion, confirming corporate reliance on foreign capital.
• NRI deposits jumped by $12.8 billion, continuing a strong upward trend.
• Short-term trade credits increased, reflecting India’s growing import activity.
• Valuation effects from the stronger US dollar added $5.3 billion.
• Share of concessional (low-interest) debt fell to 6.9%, a sign of India’s transition toward more market-driven financing.

Risk Assessment and Sustainability
While the overall rise appears large, India’s debt profile remains prudent and sustainable for several reasons:
1. High forex reserve coverage – Reserves covering 91% of debt provide a strong safeguard.
2. Dominance of long-term debt – With over 80% of liabilities maturing beyond one year, refinancing risks are limited.
3. Diversified borrowers – Debt is spread across corporates, financial institutions, and governments, reducing concentration risk.
4. Moderate debt-to-GDP ratio – At 19.1%, India’s ratio is much lower than many emerging markets.
However, dependence on commercial borrowings and the dominance of the US dollar expose India to global interest rate hikes and currency volatility.

Implications for Growth and Policy
The rising external debt carries both opportunities and challenges:
• Positive Side:
o Financing infrastructure and technology upgrades supports long-term growth.
o Strong NRI deposits highlight investor confidence.
o Managed exposure helps integrate India into global financial systems.
• Challenges:
o Higher commercial debt raises repayment costs if global rates rise.
o Dollar dominance makes India sensitive to currency fluctuations.
o Declining concessional debt reduces access to cheaper funds.
Going forward, policymakers will likely focus on:
• Encouraging rupee-denominated external borrowing to limit currency risks.
• Strengthening domestic capital markets to reduce dependence on foreign loans.
• Careful monitoring of short-term debt to ensure stability.

Conclusion
India’s external debt rose by 10% in FY25 to $736.3 billion, largely driven by commercial borrowings, NRI deposits, and trade credits. Despite this sharp increase, the structure remains sound with a strong bias toward long-term loans and substantial forex reserves that cover nearly the entire debt stock.
While risks from global interest rates and US dollar fluctuations persist, India’s debt remains moderate and sustainable by international standards. The growth in external financing reflects the country’s investment needs for infrastructure and development, making external debt not just a liability, but also a driver of future economic growth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Urban Company IPO 2025: Subscription Buzz and Profit Milestone

, , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
RBI's Revised Co-Lending Norms Set to Transform NBFC Growth
Banking, Economy, Market News - July 16, 2025

RBI's Strategic Liquidity Management: A ₹2 Trillion Operation Looms

RBI’s Strategic Liquidity Management: A ₹2 Trillion Operation Looms

In a liquidity management move watched closely by financial markets, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) conducted a two-day Variable Rate Reverse Repo (VRRR) auction on July 9, accepting ₹97,315 crore from banks. This came just shy of the ₹1 trillion it had offered. Market participants believe the cautious bidding reflects expectations of a much larger liquidity absorption—possibly ₹2 trillion—on the horizon.

RBI Tightens Grip on Surplus Liquidity
The accepted bids cleared at a cut-off rate of 5.49%, slightly higher than the 5.47% seen in the previous seven-day VRRR held on July 4. This increase, though modest, suggests that banks are pricing in tighter liquidity going forward or preparing for another, much larger VRRR operation.
Traders and treasury dealers believe the higher rate points to growing uncertainty in the short-term money market. With expectations of a ₹2 trillion auction soon, many institutions held back from fully subscribing to the current round, choosing instead to wait and see how the RBI proceeds.

Liquidity Remains in Surplus—But Banks Tread Carefully
Even after the RBI’s significant withdrawal of funds via the VRRR mechanism, surplus liquidity remains abundant in India’s banking sector. As per RBI figures dated July 8, the system still held an excess of ₹3.07 trillion.
Still, the higher cut-off rate indicates that banks are becoming more cautious. There is still no clarity on where the RBI wants overnight rates to settle—whether close to the repo rate of 5.50% or somewhere between the repo and the Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) rate of 5.25%.
A dealer from a state-owned bank noted:
“There is expectation of a ₹2-trillion VRRR announcement soon. It remains uncertain whether the RBI aims to anchor the overnight rate precisely at 5.50% or prefers it to fluctuate within the range bounded by the Standing Deposit Facility and the repo rate. This uncertainty is leading to cautious bidding and a higher cut-off.”

Short-Term Rates Show an Uptrend
The rising rates in the money market support this cautious outlook. Key short-term rates have moved upward recently:
• The Weighted Average Call Rate (WACR) increased to 5.34%, compared to around 5.26% a week ago.
The interest rate for Tri-party repos advanced to 5.29%, marking a rise from the previous benchmark of 5.13%.
This suggests that short-term money is becoming slightly more expensive, even with surplus liquidity still in the system.

A Look at Recent VRRR Activity
This auction is part of a series of regular VRRR operations the RBI has been conducting to manage surplus liquidity and guide short-term interest rates. Here’s a quick recap:
• On July 4, during a seven-day Variable Rate Reverse Repo (VRRR) auction, the Reserve Bank of India attracted ₹1.7 trillion in total bids but chose to absorb only ₹1 trillion, setting the cut-off yield at 5.47%.
• On June 27, the Reserve Bank of India absorbed ₹84,975 crore from the banking system, with the average return rate settling at 5.45%.
• June 18: A similar pattern was observed, with selective acceptance at competitive rates.
These auctions show RBI’s consistent effort to sterilize excess liquidity and fine-tune monetary transmission.

Expectations Building for a ₹2 Trillion Operation
Speculation within financial circles suggests that the Reserve Bank may soon initiate a Variable Rate Reverse Repo (VRRR) operation worth ₹2 trillion, possibly within the near-term horizon. There are several reasons why a large liquidity absorption may soon be necessary:
• A recent reduction in the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) has freed up nearly ₹2.5 trillion, effectively releasing that volume of funds into the banking system and enhancing overall liquidity.
• The Reserve Bank of India’s transfer of surplus funds to the government will, in due course, make their way back into circulation within the banking sector.
• Bond maturities and government spending: Both can temporarily elevate surplus liquidity.
Analysts predict that by October–November, the total liquidity surplus could grow to ₹5 trillion, making larger VRRR operations not just likely—but necessary.

Why VRRR Matters in Monetary Policy
1. Variable Rate Reverse Repo (VRRR) auctions serve as essential instruments in the Reserve Bank of India’s strategy to regulate liquidity. By conducting these operations, the RBI draws surplus funds out of the banking sector, helping to maintain monetary balance.
2. Prevent oversupply of money, which can lead to lower short-term rates and weaken monetary policy transmission.
3. Stabilize overnight rates like WACR, keeping them aligned with the central bank’s policy stance.
4. Manage inflation expectations, since surplus liquidity can fuel asset bubbles or consumption spikes.
By actively managing liquidity through VRRR, the RBI reinforces the effectiveness of its repo and reverse repo corridor.

Banks Playing It Smart
Banks, for their part, are being strategic. Many chose not to deploy their entire surplus in the latest VRRR, likely keeping some buffer for potential rate volatility or the upcoming larger auction. The move to bid at higher rates suggests that banks are aiming to hedge risk rather than chase marginal returns.
Some analysts believe this “wait and watch” behavior will continue until the RBI provides greater clarity on its short-term liquidity roadmap—especially if more durable liquidity (like long-term money) continues to flood the system.

Looking Ahead
With inflation under control and growth momentum holding steady, the RBI is expected to maintain its current policy stance. However, the central bank’s liquidity operations—like the VRRR—will remain active and adaptive to market conditions.
A potential ₹2 trillion auction will be watched closely not just for the amount, but also for the tenor (7-day, 14-day, etc.) and the cut-off rate. These factors will offer deeper insight into RBI’s evolving liquidity strategy.

Conclusion
By taking in ₹97,315 crore through its most recent VRRR operation, the Reserve Bank of India has demonstrated a forward-looking stance in handling excess liquidity within the banking system. As anticipation builds around a potential ₹2 trillion liquidity operation, financial institutions are treading carefully—mindful of excess funds in the system while closely observing the Reserve Bank’s next strategic steps. In the weeks ahead, the central bank may adopt a more assertive stance to fine-tune the delicate balance between economic expansion, price stability, and overall financial system health.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

IREDA Bonds Gain Tax Benefits to Promote Green Energy

, , , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
IREDA Bonds Gain Tax Benefits to Promote Green Energy
Market News, Markets - July 10, 2025

Corporate Bond Issuances Set to Hit ₹11 Trillion in FY26 Amid Falling Rates and Delayed Bank Transmission

Corporate Bond Issuances Set to Hit ₹11 Trillion in FY26 Amid Falling Rates and Delayed Bank Transmission

India’s corporate debt market is poised for another record-breaking year in FY26, with bond issuances expected to exceed ₹11 trillion. This would mark a significant jump from ₹9.95 trillion raised in FY25 and signals a shift in preference toward market-based borrowing over traditional bank loans. With bond yields declining and banks slow to cut lending rates, companies are seizing the opportunity to raise funds at lower costs.

Key Drivers Behind the Surge in Bond Issuances

The surge in corporate bond issuance is largely driven by the divergence in rate transmission between the bond market and the banking system. After the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) initiated rate cuts, yields in the bond market responded swiftly. The 10-year government bond yield fell nearly 38 basis points from 6.70% to 6.32%, making it more attractive for corporates to raise funds through bonds.

In contrast, banks were slower to pass on the benefits of rate cuts. For instance, the one-year marginal cost of lending rate (MCLR) dropped by only 10 basis points during the same period, standing at 8.90%. This lag in rate transmission has widened the cost gap, making debt markets the preferred route for corporates seeking affordable capital.

Front-Loading of Borrowings

Another notable trend is the front-loading of bond issuances. During the first quarter of FY26, companies secured ₹2.79 trillion via 506 private placements—significantly surpassing the ₹1.56 trillion raised in the same quarter of FY25.This sharp increase shows that corporates are rushing to lock in lower rates before any possible reversal in monetary policy.

Companies still favour private placements as their primary method for raising debt. Companies prefer this route due to its flexibility, quicker turnaround, and reduced compliance compared to public issues. In FY25, only ₹19,000 crore was raised through public bond issuances, highlighting the overwhelming preference for private deals.

Who’s Borrowing and at What Rates?

The bulk of recent bond issuances have come from highly rated companies, especially those with AAA credit ratings. Firms like Bajaj Housing Finance and L&T Finance successfully raised funds in June with coupon rates ranging between 7.0% and 7.5%. These rates are considerably lower than those offered by banks for similar credit quality, reinforcing the shift towards bonds.

The investor base for corporate bonds is also expanding. Mutual funds, insurance companies, and pension funds are showing growing interest in these instruments due to the attractive yield spreads over government securities. This demand further supports the momentum in the primary bond market.

Market Size and Comparison with Global Peers

Despite the robust growth, India’s corporate bond market remains underdeveloped relative to other major economies. Currently, the market accounts for about 18% of the country’s GDP. In contrast, China’s corporate debt market represents roughly 36% of its GDP, and South Korea’s stands at nearly 80%.

The lack of a deep and active secondary market is one of the main reasons behind this gap. According to RBI data, the average secondary market turnover in corporate bonds is only about 3.8% of outstanding bonds. Low liquidity discourages retail participation and limits price discovery, posing a challenge to long-term market development.

Delayed Transmission in Bank Credit

While bond issuances have grown rapidly, bank credit to industries continues to lag. As of May 2025, year-on-year credit growth to the industrial sector stood at 4.8%—a modest figure compared to the spike in debt market activity. The slow adjustment in lending rates and tight credit assessment by banks have nudged corporates toward more efficient capital-raising options like bonds.

Forecasts and Outlook

Rating agencies and market participants expect this trend to continue. ICRA estimates that corporate bond issuances may total between ₹10.7 trillion and ₹11.3 trillion by FY26-end. Others believe that if the current momentum continues, the market could even surpass ₹12 trillion this fiscal year.

However, the pace may moderate in the second half of the year if the RBI decides to pause or reverse its rate-cutting cycle due to inflationary pressures or global uncertainties. Additionally, improving secondary market liquidity and increasing public issuances could further support the market’s depth and resilience.

Structural Reforms Still Needed

Despite strong momentum, several structural issues need to be addressed. These include improving transparency, easing public issuance norms, developing the secondary market, and encouraging wider investor participation. SEBI and RBI have taken steps in this direction, but consistent reforms are essential to build a deeper and more vibrant corporate bond ecosystem.

Conclusion

India’s corporate bond market is on track for another landmark year, fueled by favorable interest rate dynamics and increased reliance on private placements. As companies take advantage of lower yields and bypass sluggish bank lending, the debt market is evolving into a major funding channel. Yet, for sustainable growth, long-standing challenges like liquidity, access, and regulatory hurdles must be tackled head-on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

ICICI Bank Shares Slip as ICICI Prudential AMC Files for Landmark ₹10,000 Crore IPO

, , , , , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More
US Airstrike on Iran: Oil Shock for India
Economy, Market News - June 23, 2025

US Airstrike on Iran: Oil Shock for India

US Airstrike on Iran: Oil Shock for India

As geopolitical tensions escalate in the Middle East, India braces for potential fallout on inflation, trade deficits, and foreign capital movement—though experts caution the damage could remain contained if the crisis doesn’t widen.

Summary:
The recent US military strike on Iran has sent tremors through global markets, rekindling fears of a spike in crude oil prices and capital flow volatility—particularly for oil-importing nations like India. While economists warn of risks to India’s current account deficit, inflation, and trade balance, many believe the actual impact will be manageable unless the conflict spreads further. With India’s dependence on Middle Eastern oil and reliance on stable foreign capital inflows, the evolving geopolitical landscape could test the country’s economic resilience.

Tensions in the Gulf Threaten Fragile Economic Stability
In a move that could reshape geopolitical and economic equations in the region, the United States has carried out targeted airstrikes on Iranian military infrastructure, raising the spectre of a broader regional conflict. While the immediate military implications are being assessed globally, the economic ramifications—particularly for India—are already beginning to materialize.
Crude oil prices surged by over 6% overnight, breaching the $90 per barrel mark, as markets priced in the possibility of retaliatory action from Iran, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, and general instability in one of the world’s most vital energy corridors.
India, as the third-largest importer of crude oil globally, is especially vulnerable to this type of external shock. Over 85% of the country’s oil needs are met through imports, with a significant portion coming from the Middle East. Any sustained rise in crude prices can upend India’s current account balance, inflation outlook, and fiscal deficit, posing significant challenges for policymakers.

Current Account Deficit Likely to Widen
India’s current account deficit (CAD) has been a point of concern in recent months, standing at 1.2% of GDP in FY24. A sudden spike in oil prices can add billions of dollars to the import bill, potentially pushing the CAD toward 2% or more, depending on how long prices stay elevated.
According to Nomura India, a $10 increase in crude oil prices for a sustained period could widen the CAD by 0.3% of GDP, translating to approximately $10–12 billion in additional import costs.
This deterioration in external balances could pressure the rupee, which has already been showing signs of depreciation, and make it more expensive for Indian corporates to service foreign currency debt.

Inflation and Fiscal Challenges Ahead
The impact on inflation is another major worry. While India’s inflation had been stabilizing after a turbulent 2023, elevated energy prices can lead to a pass-through effect on transportation, logistics, and food prices—especially vegetables and pulses, which are highly sensitive to fuel costs.
A prolonged spike in Brent crude could push headline CPI inflation beyond the 4.5% RBI target, potentially forcing the central bank to delay any interest rate cuts planned for the second half of 2025.
On the fiscal front, higher oil prices may compel the government to increase subsidies on LPG and diesel or cut excise duties—leading to a revenue shortfall at a time when the Centre is trying to balance fiscal prudence with growth stimulus ahead of state elections.

Capital Flow Volatility and Market Risks
In times of geopolitical stress, emerging markets often see capital outflows as global investors shift to safe-haven assets like the US dollar, gold, and US Treasuries. India’s foreign institutional investor (FII) flows have been robust so far in 2025, but that could reverse if risk aversion spikes.
Already, the benchmark BSE Sensex dropped 600 points, and the INR slipped to 83.80 per USD in early trade following news of the strike. If the conflict escalates further, market volatility may persist, impacting portfolio investments, bond yields, and currency stability.

Strategic Oil Reserves and Policy Measures in Place
India, however, is not entirely defenceless. The country maintains Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPRs) equivalent to around 9.5 days of consumption, which can be deployed during emergencies to buffer against sudden supply disruptions.
Additionally, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) holds forex reserves of over $640 billion, providing a firm cushion against external shocks and currency volatility. The government may also resort to calibrated excise cuts, oil bonds, and revised subsidies to soften the impact on the common man.

What Happens If the Conflict Escalates?
Economists caution that while the current situation is concerning, it remains manageable unless the conflict spreads to involve other Gulf countries or leads to an actual blockade of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of the global oil supply passes.
Any Iranian retaliation targeting oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, UAE, or Iraq could send crude prices well past $100 per barrel, severely disrupting global and Indian economic forecasts.
“The longer the conflict drags on, the higher the risks to India’s macroeconomic stability,” said Sonal Verma, Chief Economist at Nomura India. “The silver lining is that India has buffers and past experience managing oil shocks—but policymakers will need to be agile.”

Geopolitics Meets Economics: A Test for India’s Resilience
In a globalized world, India’s economy is inextricably linked to geopolitical developments. The US strike on Iran has reignited concerns about energy security, foreign capital dependence, and inflation management. While India has improved its economic fundamentals over the past decade, external shocks like these highlight persistent vulnerabilities.
With the Union Budget 2025 and potential rate decisions by the RBI on the horizon, economic planning will have to incorporate these new geopolitical risks. Flexibility in fiscal policy, proactive diplomacy, and a focus on energy diversification will be critical in the months ahead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The image added is for representation purposes only

Mutual Funds Now One-Third of Bank Deposits!

, , , , , , , , , , , 0 Comment
Read More