Menu

DeepSeek

Barriers for India to make Deepseek

Barriers for India to make Deepseek

Barriers for India to make Deepseek

In recent times, there is a rising question about why India is not able to catch up with the USA like China in terms of advancement in science and technology. There is always a concern about why India is not able to become an international manufacturing hub like China. Though several efforts were taken by various Prime Ministers over a period of time.

In contrast to this, China has not only reached the same level as the USA in terms of science and innovation but has possibly overshadowed the USA. While, India is still struggling to reach the same level.

Development of China
China is aggressively engaging in a competition with the USA in various fields of science and technologies such as Nuclear Fusion, Editing Gene of plants and humans, Quantum Computing, designing and manufacturing chips, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and many more. In the previous several years, China was able to successfully stand at the same level with the USA in areas such as Artificial intelligence and quantum computing. When China was prohibited from importing advanced computing chips from the USA, it started to develop its own advanced GPU design for the purpose of the AI model. Though in terms of comparison, chips made by Huawei are not as great as the advanced chips of Nvidia.

In the past, one of the Chinese scientists was imprisoned for working on creating babies through gene editing embryos. However, he is now free and back to his work. It possibly means China did not want to make this research and its progress known in the world.

Apart from this gene editing research, China was quite open about its other areas of research and technology. It created a nuclear fusion reactor known by the name ‘Artificial Sun.’ It resulted in China making a world record in building a high confinement plasma.

China has made many innovations in the fields of Drones, Quantum Computing, AI, Robotics, and designing of chips. It has also built its capacity in terms of military advancement by creating the sixth generation of fighter jet. It also developed the biggest solar farm which is floating on water in the world.

Development of India
India is struggling in terms of innovation in the field of science and technology. In recent times, India is more focused on creating applications for AI models instead of creating high tech AI models. The research work in Quantum Chemistry is ongoing but no significant achievements so far. It was able to send a rover to the moon in the past. Due to dependence on other nations, its development in military technology is hampered. Few years back, India built Tejas Mk 2 but it is not helpful for the Indian Air Force as it is heavily dependent on the USA for engines. In the year 1987, India began to work in the field of nuclear fusion with a stable state of progress. Despite this, it is not able to create significant advancement.

India has a big base of graduates in STEM fields but it mainly focuses on developing applications and not pure research. In terms of building applications, it is not so much of an innovator.

Reason for India’s struggle in Science and Technology
India does have talent for science and technology. Many research papers in the USA are mostly co-written by Chinese and Indian scientists only. Also, many innovations in the USA are due to the work of Indian scientists and researchers. One of the major reasons for the struggle of India is due to its lack of financing in the area of Research and Development.

The contribution of financing in R&D is about 0.64 percent from India’s GDP in contrast to R&D investment in the USA and China is about 3.47 percent and 2.41 percent, respectively. Further, the private sector investment in R&D in India is about 36.4 percent only. While the USA and China have contributions of about 75 percent and 77 percent, respectively.

Another reason is various governments in India over the period of time did not have much of a goal to become international leader in the field of science and technology. In contrast to this, China has taken a strong stand in terms of developing science and technology in the country many years ago. Since the 1990s, it has made necessary changes in its education as well as other systems. It has worked on building facilities and opportunities for development in science and technology from the ground level of primary schools to the top level of high-tech universities. Even though it is a communist country, it has taken necessary efforts to promote business in science and technology by providing state incentives and creating high goals. It has also worked on trying to get Chinese scientists back in China who were employed in the USA.

Pre and Post 1970s for India
Until initial 1970s, India had a strong position in terms of innovation in science even in the pre-independence period. This is the efforts of TATA groups to build research institutions and also establishment of institutions like DRDO, ISRO, and many more. It was not only the efforts of the Nehru government but also Indian scientists like Homi Bhabha and Vikram Sarabhai who chose to work in India rather than going abroad.

Since the 1970s many Indian researchers have gone to Europe and USA due to better facilities and the education system also lacks focus in STEM fields.

In the present times, this same situation is still prevailing in India. Many IITians go abroad or start a startup or go for conventional jobs. These startups are not based on creation of new products. Even big companies like Infosys and TATA are not ready to fund pure research even though TATA has a history of doing it in the pre-independence period. The reason might be because these companies are expecting government actions. It is time for the Government to take actions for the development of science and technology.

The image added is for representation purposes only

Maruti Suzuki India to hike prices from Feb

Rapido vs Ola-Uber: How a Bike Taxi Startup Disrupted India’s Ride-Hailing Market

DeepSeek's Rise Shakes AI Industry, Sends Markets into Decline

DeepSeek’s Rise Shakes AI Industry, Sends Markets into Decline

Overview

After a brutal session on Wall Street, where the collapse caused by a questioning of the artificial intelligence boom continued into a second day, Japanese shares led losses in Asian stocks. Big IT companies led the declines, with SoftBank Group Corp. plunging 6% and Advantest Corp. falling as high as 11% in Tokyo. That came after the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 fell Monday due to worries that values might be difficult to support due to a low-cost AI model from a Chinese business called DeepSeek. As the Lunar New Year holidays begin, several Asian markets, including those in China and South Korea, will be closed on Tuesday.

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would soon impose tariffs on foreign-produced semiconductors, medicines, and some metals to force manufacturers to manufacture in the nation, the dollar appreciated against all of its Group-of-10 rivals. The next Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, was confirmed. According to the Financial Times, Bessent supported gradual universal taxation.

The DeepSeek Conundrum

Liang Wenfeng, the head of AI-driven quant hedge firm High-Flyer, created DeepSeek in 2023. The business creates AI models that are open-source, allowing the software to be examined and enhanced by the larger developer community. Following its introduction in early January, its mobile app shot to the top of the US iPhone download charts.

Since its January release in the US, an AI-powered chatbot developed by the Chinese startup DeepSeek has rapidly risen to the top of the free app download list on the Apple store. Financial markets have been rocked by the app’s unexpected rise in popularity and DeepSeek’s purportedly low prices when compared to AI firms with headquarters in the US.

Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist from Silicon Valley, has praised DeepSeek as one of the most remarkable and astounding advances in artificial intelligence. The company claims that at a tenth of the price, its most recent AI models are comparable to industry-leading models in the US, such as ChatGPT. The app’s developers claim that it only cost $6 million (£4.8 million) to develop, a significant reduction from the billions of dollars that US AI companies have spent.

AI Fall to continue?

Matthew Haupt, a portfolio manager at Wilson Asset Management, stated that while it is too soon to predict the future effects of DeepSeek, it has shown that the industries that could be affected are crowded. He also stated that the prospects for a selloff have changed because the concerns around growth outlooks are no longer entirely predetermined.

The market narrative that has dominated since Donald Trump’s reelection in November —America-first, tech-fueled bullishness that saw a clear upward path for risk assets pushed by deregulation, tax cuts, and even government support of AI investment—was further shattered by Monday’s AI fall.

Following Monday’s selloff, US equity futures saw minimal movement in the early hours of Tuesday. With the 10-year yield up one basis point to 4.55% after dropping nine basis points on Monday, treasuries marginally declined in Asia. The gains from Monday were maintained by a 0.3% increase in the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index. Taiwan and Vietnam are among the other Asian markets that close for the Lunar New Year vacations. Singaporean and Hong Kong bourses are scheduled to close early.

In New York, Nvidia Corp., the face of the AI revolution, fell 17%, losing $589 billion in market value—the highest ever for a single stock. Despite recent efforts to reduce their power, the group of companies that make up roughly 40% of the Nasdaq 100 include Nvidia, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Meta Platforms Inc., and Alphabet Inc. In the S&P 500, it is almost 30%.

Chinese Lunar New Year

As Chinese investors begin their Lunar New Year holidays, which will end on Tuesday, they have a lot to think about. The country’s economy unexpectedly slowed down at the beginning of the year, halting the momentum of a rebound spurred by stimulus plans and highlighting Beijing’s need to take more action to avoid another recession. In an effort to boost trust in the so-called Magnificent Seven group of firms, traders around the world will be focusing on this week’s earnings releases from companies like Apple and Microsoft.

With company shares close to all-time highs and their valuations stretched, investors are about to enter another crucial Big Tech earnings cycle. This time, there’s a crucial difference: the group’s earnings growth is anticipated to be the slowest in over two years.

DeepSeek hitting American companies hard

DeepSeek sets itself apart from other chatbots, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, by explaining its logic before responding to a prompt. According to the business, its R1 release provides performance comparable to OpenAI’s most recent, and it has issued licenses to anyone who wants to build chatbots with the technology.

According to reports, DeepSeek was created for hundreds of millions of dollars less than its US competitors, which raises concerns about America’s continued dominance in AI. On January 27, financial markets were rocked by the company’s allegedly reduced costs, which caused the tech-heavy Nasdaq to plummet more than 3% in a global sell-off that included data centers and chip manufacturers.

The US-based Nvidia, which produces the potent chips that underpin AI, seems to have been the most severely affected. As its stock price fell 17% over the day, it lost around $600 billion in market value on Monday, the worst one-day decline for any firm in US history. According to Forbes, Nvidia’s market worth dropped from $3.5 trillion to $2.9 trillion on Monday, dropping it to third place behind Apple and Microsoft, the most valuable business in the world by market capitalization. Compared to Nvidia’s semiconductor chips, DeepSeek employs less sophisticated ones.

Their achievement challenges the notion that the only means to advance AI are with larger budgets and top-tier CPUs, a notion that has greatly raised doubts about the necessity and prospects of high-performance computers.

The image added is for representation purposes only

Budget needs to focus on local infrastructure